Stop frowning, it´s true: reduced corrugator activity indicates increased positive affect after judging information as true

In line with the feelings-as-information theory, a body of research demonstrates more positive (negative) judgments in positive (negative) affective states. Similarly, it has been shown that people who experience positive (negative) affect also tend to judge incoming information as more likely being true (false). Following the argumentation of affect-congruent judgments, we assume that judging information as being true itself possesses a positive affective component. In a truth effect study, we implemented two judgment phases (10 min and 1 week after first exposure) in which 75 participants judged the truth of in total 120 (new and repeated) statements. Addressing the present research question, we assessed spontaneous facial reactions via electromyography after participants provided their truth judgments in each trial. Results reveal corrugator relaxations after judging information as true (vs. false), indicating increased positive affect. Importantly, this finding was unaffected by the repetition status and subjective confidence regarding judgments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2614304
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stop frowning, it´s true: reduced corrugator activity indicates increased positive affect after judging information as true

Torsten Wüstenberg, Annika Stump, Andreas Voss
Cognition & Emotion
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Stop frowning, it´s true: reduced corrugator activity indicates increased positive affect after judging information as true

Torsten Wüstenberg, Annika Stump, Andreas Voss
article en

Abstract

In line with the feelings-as-information theory, a body of research demonstrates more positive (negative) judgments in positive (negative) affective states. Similarly, it has been shown that people who experience positive (negative) affect also tend to judge incoming information as more likely being true (false). Following the argumentation of affect-congruent judgments, we assume that judging information as being true itself possesses a positive affective component. In a truth effect study, we implemented two judgment phases (10 min and 1 week after first exposure) in which 75 participants judged the truth of in total 120 (new and repeated) statements. Addressing the present research question, we assessed spontaneous facial reactions via electromyography after participants provided their truth judgments in each trial. Results reveal corrugator relaxations after judging information as true (vs. false), indicating increased positive affect. Importantly, this finding was unaffected by the repetition status and subjective confidence regarding judgments.

Cognition & Emotion
University of Freiburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stop frowning, it´s true: reduced corrugator activity indicates increased positive affect after judging information as true — Torsten Wüstenberg, Annika Stump, et al. · Cognition & Emotion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS