A novel approach to characterize the energy cost of human cool-seeking behavior and its individual variability during heat stress

Behavioral thermoregulation (e.g., cool-seeking) is thought to proceed autonomic heat-loss responses (e.g., sweating), due to energy-conservation requirements. However, the energy cost of cool-seeking behaviors in humans has been rarely quantified. Here, we present a novel approach to characterize the energy cost of a common human cool-seeking behavior (i.e., manual fanning) and its individual variability during heat stress. Ten healthy males (20 ± 1 yr) participated in two 60-min trials (CONTROL and FAN) consisting of resting exposure to 37(±0.4)°C and 44(±6)% relative humidity (RH). During FAN, participants freely used a hand-held fan instrumented with an accelerometer, to offset thermal discomfort. During CONTROL, no fan was provided. We measured energy expenditure (breath-by-breath gas analysis), core temperature (T<sub>c</sub>), mean skin temperature ([Formula: see text]), forehead T<sub>sk</sub>, microclimate (next-to-skin) relative humidity ([Formula: see text]), heart rate (HR), and thermal discomfort during both trials, and used FAN accelerometery data to characterize cool-seeking behavior's onset, duration, bout frequency, and work rate. Seven participants engaged with self-fanning, which varied individually in onset time [mean: 12:30 min:s (range: 00:49-30:19)], total duration [05:54 min:s (01:04-17:53)], and bouts [6 (1-17)], but not work rate (308 ± 51 strokes·min<sup>-1</sup>). Energy expenditure did not differ between FAN vs. CONTROL in those who fanned (433 ± 28 vs. 447 ± 64 kJ; <i>P</i> = 0.993), nor time-dependent changes in T<sub>c</sub>, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and HR. Our results indicate that our novel approach, which combines accelerometery (to quantify movement patterns) and indirect calorimetry (to measure associated energy expenditure), is both feasible and effective in quantifying the energetic cost of voluntary, behaviorally mediated thermoregulatory actions and their individual variability during heat stress.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We present a novel approach to characterize the energy cost of a common human cool-seeking behavior (i.e., manual fanning) and its individual variability during heat stress. Results indicate that our novel approach, which combine accelerometery (movement patterns) and indirect calorimetry (energy expenditure), is feasible and effective. This approach could be applied to a variety of thermal behaviors, thereby broadening the methodological toolkit available to researchers to study the relationship between behavioral and autonomic human thermoregulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00271.2025
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel approach to characterize the energy cost of human cool-seeking behavior and its individual variability during heat stress

Justin Sheffield, Hannah Blount, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

A novel approach to characterize the energy cost of human cool-seeking behavior and its individual variability during heat stress

Justin Sheffield, Hannah Blount, Peter R. Worsley, Davide Filingeri, Ian Galea, Francesca Romana Cavallo, Nuno Abel Koch Esteves, Daisy Luck
article en

Abstract

Behavioral thermoregulation (e.g., cool-seeking) is thought to proceed autonomic heat-loss responses (e.g., sweating), due to energy-conservation requirements. However, the energy cost of cool-seeking behaviors in humans has been rarely quantified. Here, we present a novel approach to characterize the energy cost of a common human cool-seeking behavior (i.e., manual fanning) and its individual variability during heat stress. Ten healthy males (20 ± 1 yr) participated in two 60-min trials (CONTROL and FAN) consisting of resting exposure to 37(±0.4)°C and 44(±6)% relative humidity (RH). During FAN, participants freely used a hand-held fan instrumented with an accelerometer, to offset thermal discomfort. During CONTROL, no fan was provided. We measured energy expenditure (breath-by-breath gas analysis), core temperature (T<sub>c</sub>), mean skin temperature ([Formula: see text]), forehead T<sub>sk</sub>, microclimate (next-to-skin) relative humidity ([Formula: see text]), heart rate (HR), and thermal discomfort during both trials, and used FAN accelerometery data to characterize cool-seeking behavior's onset, duration, bout frequency, and work rate. Seven participants engaged with self-fanning, which varied individually in onset time [mean: 12:30 min:s (range: 00:49-30:19)], total duration [05:54 min:s (01:04-17:53)], and bouts [6 (1-17)], but not work rate (308 ± 51 strokes·min<sup>-1</sup>). Energy expenditure did not differ between FAN vs. CONTROL in those who fanned (433 ± 28 vs. 447 ± 64 kJ; <i>P</i> = 0.993), nor time-dependent changes in T<sub>c</sub>, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and HR. Our results indicate that our novel approach, which combines accelerometery (to quantify movement patterns) and indirect calorimetry (to measure associated energy expenditure), is both feasible and effective in quantifying the energetic cost of voluntary, behaviorally mediated thermoregulatory actions and their individual variability during heat stress.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We present a novel approach to characterize the energy cost of a common human cool-seeking behavior (i.e., manual fanning) and its individual variability during heat stress. Results indicate that our novel approach, which combine accelerometery (movement patterns) and indirect calorimetry (energy expenditure), is feasible and effective. This approach could be applied to a variety of thermal behaviors, thereby broadening the methodological toolkit available to researchers to study the relationship between behavioral and autonomic human thermoregulation.

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologyVol. 330(2)
University of Southampton (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.