Effect of Medical Comorbidities on Procedural Success in Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Lung volume reduction surgery improves outcomes in a select cohort but portends high morbidity. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a less invasive, reversible manner of lung volume reduction, using one-way valves to improve lung function, quality of life, and exercise capacity. Nevertheless, knowledge gaps persist regarding factors that predict procedural success. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 142 patients who underwent BLVR at the University of Chicago between December 2018 and July 2024 to assess the relationship between comorbidities and procedural outcomes. Using logistic and multinomial regression, we determined odds ratios (ORs) for a binary outcome of success and failure and relative risk ratios (RRRs) for failure sub-categories relative to procedural success. Results: We observed a procedural success rate of 48.1% and pneumothorax prevalence of 21.8%. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and body mass index (BMI), comorbidities associated with procedural failure included chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure (CHF), anemia, and a BMI, Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise (BODE) Index of 5 or greater. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with procedural success. Conclusions: Comorbidities associated with dyspnea appear to have a significant effect on procedural success in BLVR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Respiration
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jor6010002
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Medical Comorbidities on Procedural Success in Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

A. C. Wagh, C.N. Nemeh, D. Kyle Hogarth, William F. Parker
Journal of Respiration
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Effect of Medical Comorbidities on Procedural Success in Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

A. C. Wagh, C.N. Nemeh, D. Kyle Hogarth, William F. Parker
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Lung volume reduction surgery improves outcomes in a select cohort but portends high morbidity. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a less invasive, reversible manner of lung volume reduction, using one-way valves to improve lung function, quality of life, and exercise capacity. Nevertheless, knowledge gaps persist regarding factors that predict procedural success. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 142 patients who underwent BLVR at the University of Chicago between December 2018 and July 2024 to assess the relationship between comorbidities and procedural outcomes. Using logistic and multinomial regression, we determined odds ratios (ORs) for a binary outcome of success and failure and relative risk ratios (RRRs) for failure sub-categories relative to procedural success. Results: We observed a procedural success rate of 48.1% and pneumothorax prevalence of 21.8%. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and body mass index (BMI), comorbidities associated with procedural failure included chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure (CHF), anemia, and a BMI, Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise (BODE) Index of 5 or greater. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with procedural success. Conclusions: Comorbidities associated with dyspnea appear to have a significant effect on procedural success in BLVR.

Journal of RespirationVol. 6(1)
University of Chicago (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.