Chemical analysis of fire debris in atypical fire incidents

In atypical fire cases where ignitable liquid residues were undetected using traditional fire debris detection method, analyzing other chemical traces such as the gaseous and volatile organic contents, and liquid and solid components of the debris itself, can shed light on the fire events. The forensic laboratory has broadened the scope of instrumental techniques to analyze the diverse nature of samples from fire scenes. In this paper, we reviewed the laboratory’s analytical findings of fire debris samples submitted from atypical fire incidents in recent years. We demonstrated how multi-instrumental approaches usually employed in chemical unknowns analysis, combined with understanding of the correlation between the detected compounds’ physical and chemical properties and the fire, help trace possible primary ignition sources. In local cases, potential sources of fuel in the initial event of atypical fires were categorized into flammable gases, self-heating materials, reactive mixtures, and combustible substances. However, interpreting analytical results and classifying fuel sources remain challenging as they may be subjected to the scale and complexity of scene debris, altered states, detectability of fuel traces, and the limited comprehension of the laboratory regarding the fire properties and behavior of the detected compounds and parent materials. • Atypical fire cases – typical ignitable liquid residues not detected in fire debris • Multi-instrumental approaches to analyze diverse chemical traces from fire debris • Chemical/physical properties of detected traces essential to understand fire events • Fuel traces identified: Flammables, combustibles, self-heating, reactive materials

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Reports
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2026.100453
Primary Topic
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemical analysis of fire debris in atypical fire incidents

Thiam Bon Lim, K. Y. LEE
Forensic Science International Reports
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
article

Chemical analysis of fire debris in atypical fire incidents

Thiam Bon Lim, K. Y. LEE
article en

Abstract

In atypical fire cases where ignitable liquid residues were undetected using traditional fire debris detection method, analyzing other chemical traces such as the gaseous and volatile organic contents, and liquid and solid components of the debris itself, can shed light on the fire events. The forensic laboratory has broadened the scope of instrumental techniques to analyze the diverse nature of samples from fire scenes. In this paper, we reviewed the laboratory’s analytical findings of fire debris samples submitted from atypical fire incidents in recent years. We demonstrated how multi-instrumental approaches usually employed in chemical unknowns analysis, combined with understanding of the correlation between the detected compounds’ physical and chemical properties and the fire, help trace possible primary ignition sources. In local cases, potential sources of fuel in the initial event of atypical fires were categorized into flammable gases, self-heating materials, reactive mixtures, and combustible substances. However, interpreting analytical results and classifying fuel sources remain challenging as they may be subjected to the scale and complexity of scene debris, altered states, detectability of fuel traces, and the limited comprehension of the laboratory regarding the fire properties and behavior of the detected compounds and parent materials. • Atypical fire cases – typical ignitable liquid residues not detected in fire debris • Multi-instrumental approaches to analyze diverse chemical traces from fire debris • Chemical/physical properties of detected traces essential to understand fire events • Fuel traces identified: Flammables, combustibles, self-heating, reactive materials

Forensic Science International ReportsVol. 13
Health Sciences Authority (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chemical analysis of fire debris in atypical fire incidents — Thiam Bon Lim, K. Y. LEE · Forensic Science International Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS