A force field for funding: philanthrocapitalism and localisation in Dutch development

Increasingly, international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) have become dependent on major donors. Known as philanthrocapitalism, this was critiqued for a lack of democracy and downward accountability, leading to a concentration of power among a privileged few. Simultaneously, the call for localisation increased, which refers to more inclusion and empowerment of INGOs’ local partners. In this article, we interrogate how Dutch INGOs deal with attracting major donors on the one hand (i.e. philanthrocapitalism) and demands for increasing downward accountability (i.e. localisation) on the other. Based on interviews, work experience and report analysis, we explore these allegedly contradictory movements and analyse the power dynamics regarding its four attributes of knowledge, capacity, authority and accountability. We argue that, although power can be found at all levels in the ‘force field’ between philanthrocapitalism and localisation, funding relations create space for repression and therefore the concentration of power among major donors functions largely as an obstacle to localisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Development Planning Review
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2025.35
Primary Topic
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A force field for funding: philanthrocapitalism and localisation in Dutch development

Stasja Koot, Manon Peek
International Development Planning Review
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
article

A force field for funding: philanthrocapitalism and localisation in Dutch development

Stasja Koot, Manon Peek
article en

Abstract

Increasingly, international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) have become dependent on major donors. Known as philanthrocapitalism, this was critiqued for a lack of democracy and downward accountability, leading to a concentration of power among a privileged few. Simultaneously, the call for localisation increased, which refers to more inclusion and empowerment of INGOs’ local partners. In this article, we interrogate how Dutch INGOs deal with attracting major donors on the one hand (i.e. philanthrocapitalism) and demands for increasing downward accountability (i.e. localisation) on the other. Based on interviews, work experience and report analysis, we explore these allegedly contradictory movements and analyse the power dynamics regarding its four attributes of knowledge, capacity, authority and accountability. We argue that, although power can be found at all levels in the ‘force field’ between philanthrocapitalism and localisation, funding relations create space for repression and therefore the concentration of power among major donors functions largely as an obstacle to localisation.

International Development Planning Review
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.