Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? A Systematic Literature Review

Municipal amalgamation has become a key policy tool globally, drawing significant academic attention for its effects on local governance, efficiency, and equity. This study reviews international empirical literature on municipal amalgamations, incorporating new evidence from transitional economies and introducing a spatial-scale perspective to differentiate impacts at unit-wide and subunit levels. Key findings include: (1) Most literature focuses on overall postmerger unit, with limited attention to subordinate units. Studies on overall impacts emphasize efficiency, whereas those on subordinate units focus on resource allocation and political representation. (2) Amalgamation often fails to achieve economies of scale, with subunits engaging in fiscal free-riding, increasing financial burdens. Its effects on public services are limited, and political representation in smaller areas declines. (3) Emerging research in transitional economies indicates that amalgamation improve environmental governance but has mixed economic outcomes. This review provides insights for scholars and guidance for policymakers making informed decisions on municipal amalgamation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251410080
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? A Systematic Literature Review

Tao Zheng, Bindong Sun, Kristof De Witte
Urban Affairs Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? A Systematic Literature Review

Tao Zheng, Bindong Sun, Kristof De Witte
article en

Abstract

Municipal amalgamation has become a key policy tool globally, drawing significant academic attention for its effects on local governance, efficiency, and equity. This study reviews international empirical literature on municipal amalgamations, incorporating new evidence from transitional economies and introducing a spatial-scale perspective to differentiate impacts at unit-wide and subunit levels. Key findings include: (1) Most literature focuses on overall postmerger unit, with limited attention to subordinate units. Studies on overall impacts emphasize efficiency, whereas those on subordinate units focus on resource allocation and political representation. (2) Amalgamation often fails to achieve economies of scale, with subunits engaging in fiscal free-riding, increasing financial burdens. Its effects on public services are limited, and political representation in smaller areas declines. (3) Emerging research in transitional economies indicates that amalgamation improve environmental governance but has mixed economic outcomes. This review provides insights for scholars and guidance for policymakers making informed decisions on municipal amalgamation.

Urban Affairs Review
Nanjing Normal University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? A Systematic Literature Review — Tao Zheng, Bindong Sun, et al. · Urban Affairs Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS