Prioritizing people: personalizing principal preparation programs

Purpose The researchers sought to gain insights from award-winning principals on the importance of preparing future-ready principals. The researchers purposefully selected principals who were recipients of the NASSP Principal of the Year award. The study was designed to gain a deeper understanding of their perspectives on preparing future administrators for current and future challenges. Design/methodology/approach Our research team interviewed 30 award-winning principals to gain an understanding of the needs of preparing principals in the current context of school leadership. The interviews, which lasted approximately an hour each, were transcribed and coded to identify themes across the participants. Findings Key themes included the importance of prioritizing people in K-12 leadership preparation, providing early career support, and engaging in networking throughout the principal’s professional journey. Implications provide direction for preparation programs and districts to better support early-career school leaders. Research limitations/implications Although the NASSP award process involved a nomination procedure and rubric criteria, the selection process did not use other indicators of success. Future research may focus on a different set of success considerations beyond public accolades. Practical implications The research can inform principal preparation programs to better support leaders as they navigate turbulent times. It also provides guidance to school districts in establishing mentorships and provides principals with direction on networks. Social implications The findings from this study provide guidance for universities in preparing principals, districts in supporting their growth and development, and principals in establishing their own professional networks. A focus on prioritizing people in preparation and in-service support requires intentionality in an age of challenges and change. Originality/value The principals were selected because of their exemplary service to the field of school leadership. Understanding their perspectives on how to improve the field provides a unique lens for principal preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-09-2025-0334
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing people: personalizing principal preparation programs

Jayson W. Richardson, William L. Sterrett, Amanda Roberts, Brian C. Vedder
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Prioritizing people: personalizing principal preparation programs

Jayson W. Richardson, William L. Sterrett, Amanda Roberts, Brian C. Vedder
article en

Abstract

Purpose The researchers sought to gain insights from award-winning principals on the importance of preparing future-ready principals. The researchers purposefully selected principals who were recipients of the NASSP Principal of the Year award. The study was designed to gain a deeper understanding of their perspectives on preparing future administrators for current and future challenges. Design/methodology/approach Our research team interviewed 30 award-winning principals to gain an understanding of the needs of preparing principals in the current context of school leadership. The interviews, which lasted approximately an hour each, were transcribed and coded to identify themes across the participants. Findings Key themes included the importance of prioritizing people in K-12 leadership preparation, providing early career support, and engaging in networking throughout the principal’s professional journey. Implications provide direction for preparation programs and districts to better support early-career school leaders. Research limitations/implications Although the NASSP award process involved a nomination procedure and rubric criteria, the selection process did not use other indicators of success. Future research may focus on a different set of success considerations beyond public accolades. Practical implications The research can inform principal preparation programs to better support leaders as they navigate turbulent times. It also provides guidance to school districts in establishing mentorships and provides principals with direction on networks. Social implications The findings from this study provide guidance for universities in preparing principals, districts in supporting their growth and development, and principals in establishing their own professional networks. A focus on prioritizing people in preparation and in-service support requires intentionality in an age of challenges and change. Originality/value The principals were selected because of their exemplary service to the field of school leadership. Understanding their perspectives on how to improve the field provides a unique lens for principal preparation.

Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
University of Denver (US), Baylor University (US), William & Mary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.