Phase 1 — General Methodological Foundation: Domain of Validity, Comparability, and Global Closure

This technical note presents the Phase 1 — General Methodological Foundation of the MCI Cosmological Research Program.The work introduces a set of procedural criteria designed to clarify the domain of validity, comparability, and global closure of inferential frameworks in physics and related disciplines. Rather than proposing new physical laws or models, this phase establishes methodological constraints that determine when comparisons, extrapolations, and global interpretations are legitimate, and when apparent tensions arise from violations of these constraints. The framework is deliberately conservative and diagnostic in nature. It aims to prevent category errors, overextensions of models beyond their intended domains, and spurious claims of inconsistency across theories or datasets. This Phase 1 is independent and self-contained. It serves as a methodological foundation for subsequent phases of the program, without presupposing or anticipating their results. No new dynamics, parameters, or ontological commitments are introduced.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18248522
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase 1 — General Methodological Foundation: Domain of Validity, Comparability, and Global Closure

Danilo Tavella
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

Phase 1 — General Methodological Foundation: Domain of Validity, Comparability, and Global Closure

Danilo Tavella
article en

Abstract

This technical note presents the Phase 1 — General Methodological Foundation of the MCI Cosmological Research Program.The work introduces a set of procedural criteria designed to clarify the domain of validity, comparability, and global closure of inferential frameworks in physics and related disciplines. Rather than proposing new physical laws or models, this phase establishes methodological constraints that determine when comparisons, extrapolations, and global interpretations are legitimate, and when apparent tensions arise from violations of these constraints. The framework is deliberately conservative and diagnostic in nature. It aims to prevent category errors, overextensions of models beyond their intended domains, and spurious claims of inconsistency across theories or datasets. This Phase 1 is independent and self-contained. It serves as a methodological foundation for subsequent phases of the program, without presupposing or anticipating their results. No new dynamics, parameters, or ontological commitments are introduced.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.