Efficacy of B-TACE Versus C-TACE and Potential Predictive Value of Intraoperative Balloon-Occluded Stump Pressure in HCC

<b>Objectives:</b> To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of balloon-assisted transarterial chemoembolization (B-TACE) versus conventional TACE (C-TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the potential predictive value of intraoperative balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure (Boasp). <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled study, 60 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were allocated to either the B-TACE group (<i>n</i> = 30) or the C-TACE group (<i>n</i> = 30). One patient in the B-TACE group was lost to follow-up after allocation. The primary analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, including all randomized patients, with conservative handling of missing data. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Tumor response and survival outcomes were evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Intraoperative balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure (BOASP) was measured as an exploratory parameter to quantify embolization adequacy. Adverse events (AEs) were systematically assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. <b>Results:</b> TACE achieved a higher 3-month ORR (63.3% vs. 10.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 6-month disease control rates (80.0% vs. 36.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with PFS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.148-0.608) and procedures within 6 months (1 vs. 3, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 6-month surgical conversion rate was higher (34.5% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Changes in Boasp correlated with efficacy (AUC = 0.825, <i>p</i> = 0.0398). Severe infections were lower in B-TACE (17.2% vs. 76.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> B-TACE offers superior efficacy, survival, and surgical conversion versus C-TACE with favorable safety. Boasp provides a quantitative biomarker for predicting treatment response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020668
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of B-TACE Versus C-TACE and Potential Predictive Value of Intraoperative Balloon-Occluded Stump Pressure in HCC

Zhuoyang Fan, Wen Zhang, Boyu Zhou, Liting Shan et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Efficacy of B-TACE Versus C-TACE and Potential Predictive Value of Intraoperative Balloon-Occluded Stump Pressure in HCC

Zhuoyang Fan, Wen Zhang, Boyu Zhou, Liting Shan, Rong Liu, Guowei Yang
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of balloon-assisted transarterial chemoembolization (B-TACE) versus conventional TACE (C-TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the potential predictive value of intraoperative balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure (Boasp). <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled study, 60 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were allocated to either the B-TACE group (<i>n</i> = 30) or the C-TACE group (<i>n</i> = 30). One patient in the B-TACE group was lost to follow-up after allocation. The primary analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, including all randomized patients, with conservative handling of missing data. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Tumor response and survival outcomes were evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Intraoperative balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure (BOASP) was measured as an exploratory parameter to quantify embolization adequacy. Adverse events (AEs) were systematically assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. <b>Results:</b> TACE achieved a higher 3-month ORR (63.3% vs. 10.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 6-month disease control rates (80.0% vs. 36.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with PFS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.148-0.608) and procedures within 6 months (1 vs. 3, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 6-month surgical conversion rate was higher (34.5% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Changes in Boasp correlated with efficacy (AUC = 0.825, <i>p</i> = 0.0398). Severe infections were lower in B-TACE (17.2% vs. 76.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> B-TACE offers superior efficacy, survival, and surgical conversion versus C-TACE with favorable safety. Boasp provides a quantitative biomarker for predicting treatment response.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.