Making shared care work: A national qualitative case study on collaborative practice in pediatric oncology

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> In 2018, the Netherlands centralized all pediatric oncology care at the Prinses Máxima Center (Máxima), supported by a national network of 14 Shared Care centers. These centers deliver non-intensive treatment and supportive care closer to home, enabling a hybrid model of centralized expertise and regional accessibility. While structurally in place, little is known about how regional pediatricians experience this collaboration or which factors they consider essential to its success. <h3>Methods</h3> This national qualitative multiple case study explored interprofessional collaboration between the Máxima and its Shared Care partners, from the perspective of pediatricians in all 14 regional centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using ATLAS.ti. Analysis was informed by Kaats & Opheij's collaboration framework, encompassing shared ambition, mutual interests, interpersonal relationships, structured collaboration, and meaningful processes. Peer debriefing was used to enhance trustworthiness and ensure clinical relevance. <h3>Results</h3> Participants emphasized that close collaboration is indispensable for delivering safe, high-quality pediatric oncology care. Enabling factors included mutual trust, personal familiarity, timely and clear communication, and professional recognition. Challenges were identified in areas such as inconsistent policy implementation, opaque decision-making, and insufficient acknowledgment of local expertise. Many called for differentiated, context-sensitive care agreements rather than one-size-fits-all approaches. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Effective shared care requires more than structural alignment: it demands investment in professional relationships, shared goals, and adaptive processes. These findings offer actionable insights to improve collaboration within the Dutch model and provide transferable lessons for other countries navigating centralized care in highcomplex, low-volume pediatric specialties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EJC Paediatric Oncology
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100485
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making shared care work: A national qualitative case study on collaborative practice in pediatric oncology

Natasja Dors, Marije P. Hennus, Laura Keukens, M M Weismuller et al.
EJC Paediatric Oncology
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Making shared care work: A national qualitative case study on collaborative practice in pediatric oncology

Natasja Dors, Marije P. Hennus, Laura Keukens, M M Weismuller, Eline A. M. Zijtregtop, Nathalie L.M. van der Salm, Anne Jonge Poerink, Hester N. Blufpand, Wouter J.W. Kollen, Marion Hekkelaan, Wendy M.L.E. Nix, Max Maria van Noesel, Martine van Grotel, Lotte Helder, Rod Thompson, Charlotte Drykoningen, Annemieke van der Wey, Jenneke Homan, Selma Lavrijssen
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> In 2018, the Netherlands centralized all pediatric oncology care at the Prinses Máxima Center (Máxima), supported by a national network of 14 Shared Care centers. These centers deliver non-intensive treatment and supportive care closer to home, enabling a hybrid model of centralized expertise and regional accessibility. While structurally in place, little is known about how regional pediatricians experience this collaboration or which factors they consider essential to its success. <h3>Methods</h3> This national qualitative multiple case study explored interprofessional collaboration between the Máxima and its Shared Care partners, from the perspective of pediatricians in all 14 regional centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using ATLAS.ti. Analysis was informed by Kaats & Opheij's collaboration framework, encompassing shared ambition, mutual interests, interpersonal relationships, structured collaboration, and meaningful processes. Peer debriefing was used to enhance trustworthiness and ensure clinical relevance. <h3>Results</h3> Participants emphasized that close collaboration is indispensable for delivering safe, high-quality pediatric oncology care. Enabling factors included mutual trust, personal familiarity, timely and clear communication, and professional recognition. Challenges were identified in areas such as inconsistent policy implementation, opaque decision-making, and insufficient acknowledgment of local expertise. Many called for differentiated, context-sensitive care agreements rather than one-size-fits-all approaches. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Effective shared care requires more than structural alignment: it demands investment in professional relationships, shared goals, and adaptive processes. These findings offer actionable insights to improve collaboration within the Dutch model and provide transferable lessons for other countries navigating centralized care in highcomplex, low-volume pediatric specialties.

EJC Paediatric OncologyVol. 7
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL), VieCuri Medisch Centrum (NL), Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL), Princess Máxima Center (NL), Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL), Isala (NL), Westfriesgasthuis (NL), Admiraal De Ruyter Ziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Deventer Ziekenhuis (NL), Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.