The Effect of Dynamic Injurious Axial Impact on Human Cervical Intervertebral Disc Pressure Response: Methodology & Initial Results

Cervical spine (c-spine) injuries are a prominent concern in sporting activities, and dynamic axial (i.e., head-first) impacts are associated with a high risk of c-spine trauma. This methodology study implanted pressure sensors in post-mortem human subject (PMHS) cervical intervertebral discs (CIVDs) to assess biomechanical response and disc pressure changes during dynamic injurious axial impacts. Two fresh frozen male head–neck PMHS (cephalus with complete c-spine) were instrumented with miniature pressure sensors (Model 060S, Precision Measurement Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at three CIVD levels (upper, middle, and lower c-spine). Experiments replicated the Nightingale et al. studies, simulating a rigid unconstrained head vertex (0°) axial impact. PMHS were raised to a drop height of 0.53 m to reach the desired impact velocity of ~3.2 m/s and were allowed to drop vertically. Results showed characteristic c-spine deformations/buckling motion patterns and marked CIVD pressure differences between CIVD levels. The more cranial (C2–C4) and caudal (C6–T1) CIVD exhibited greater and more comparable pressure values than those of the mid-spine (C4–C6), and the pressure in upper/lower levels was at least ~four to six times higher than that of the middle. This study establishes the feasibility and assesses the potential of CIVD pressure as a biomechanical metric for assessing injurious axial loading and contributes a novel experimental framework for future injury tolerance research and model validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020872
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Dynamic Injurious Axial Impact on Human Cervical Intervertebral Disc Pressure Response: Methodology & Initial Results

Sara Sochor, Carlos Rodríguez-Morcillo García, Juan M. Asensio-Gil, Francisco J. Lopez-Valdes et al.
Applied Sciences
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

The Effect of Dynamic Injurious Axial Impact on Human Cervical Intervertebral Disc Pressure Response: Methodology & Initial Results

Sara Sochor, Carlos Rodríguez-Morcillo García, Juan M. Asensio-Gil, Francisco J. Lopez-Valdes, Mark R. Sochor
article en

Abstract

Cervical spine (c-spine) injuries are a prominent concern in sporting activities, and dynamic axial (i.e., head-first) impacts are associated with a high risk of c-spine trauma. This methodology study implanted pressure sensors in post-mortem human subject (PMHS) cervical intervertebral discs (CIVDs) to assess biomechanical response and disc pressure changes during dynamic injurious axial impacts. Two fresh frozen male head–neck PMHS (cephalus with complete c-spine) were instrumented with miniature pressure sensors (Model 060S, Precision Measurement Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at three CIVD levels (upper, middle, and lower c-spine). Experiments replicated the Nightingale et al. studies, simulating a rigid unconstrained head vertex (0°) axial impact. PMHS were raised to a drop height of 0.53 m to reach the desired impact velocity of ~3.2 m/s and were allowed to drop vertically. Results showed characteristic c-spine deformations/buckling motion patterns and marked CIVD pressure differences between CIVD levels. The more cranial (C2–C4) and caudal (C6–T1) CIVD exhibited greater and more comparable pressure values than those of the mid-spine (C4–C6), and the pressure in upper/lower levels was at least ~four to six times higher than that of the middle. This study establishes the feasibility and assesses the potential of CIVD pressure as a biomechanical metric for assessing injurious axial loading and contributes a novel experimental framework for future injury tolerance research and model validation.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(2)
University of Virginia (US), Universidad Pontificia Comillas (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.