Measuring neoliberal individualism, instrumentality, and competition: Development and validation of the Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs Questionnaire (NLBQ)

Abstract This article presents the development and validation of the Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs Questionnaire (NLBQ), a novel measure designed to analyze neoliberal ideological beliefs specifically within the context of work and employment. The NLBQ is theoretically grounded in the distinction of three fundamental political neoliberal logics: individualism, instrumentality, and competition. To evaluate its psychometric properties, factorial, and construct validity, the NLBQ was administered to four convenience samples of altogether N = 4075 participants from Austria and Germany (Study 1: n = 664; Study 2: n = 458; Study 3: n = 559; Study 4: n = 2394). The initial 90‐item pool, developed through extensive group discussions and iterative testing, was reduced to a final 18‐item version through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA). The four studies confirmed the three‐dimensional structure of the NLBQ and demonstrated its convergent and incremental validity by computing bivariate and partial correlations with established scales measuring related constructs, such as neoliberal beliefs analyzed with an alternative measure (Neoliberal Beliefs Inventory), ideologies of market competition and shareholder interest, economic system justification, political left–right self‐placement, social dominance orientation, dark triad personality, and group‐focused enmity. The final 18‐item version demonstrated satisfactory fit indices across all four samples. Finally, we derived a 9‐item short version, which also showed strong psychometric properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70049
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring neoliberal individualism, instrumentality, and competition: Development and validation of the Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs Questionnaire (NLBQ)

Thomas Höge, Severin Hornung, Christine Unterrainer
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Measuring neoliberal individualism, instrumentality, and competition: Development and validation of the Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs Questionnaire (NLBQ)

Thomas Höge, Severin Hornung, Christine Unterrainer
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents the development and validation of the Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs Questionnaire (NLBQ), a novel measure designed to analyze neoliberal ideological beliefs specifically within the context of work and employment. The NLBQ is theoretically grounded in the distinction of three fundamental political neoliberal logics: individualism, instrumentality, and competition. To evaluate its psychometric properties, factorial, and construct validity, the NLBQ was administered to four convenience samples of altogether N = 4075 participants from Austria and Germany (Study 1: n = 664; Study 2: n = 458; Study 3: n = 559; Study 4: n = 2394). The initial 90‐item pool, developed through extensive group discussions and iterative testing, was reduced to a final 18‐item version through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA). The four studies confirmed the three‐dimensional structure of the NLBQ and demonstrated its convergent and incremental validity by computing bivariate and partial correlations with established scales measuring related constructs, such as neoliberal beliefs analyzed with an alternative measure (Neoliberal Beliefs Inventory), ideologies of market competition and shareholder interest, economic system justification, political left–right self‐placement, social dominance orientation, dark triad personality, and group‐focused enmity. The final 18‐item version demonstrated satisfactory fit indices across all four samples. Finally, we derived a 9‐item short version, which also showed strong psychometric properties.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 26(1)
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.