New approach methodologies for contaminant risk assessment in environmental justice communities: let’s not miss the opportunity

New approach methodologies (NAMs) are emergent tools and methods that are increasingly being viewed by the regulatory and scientific community as ones that can support or even replace traditional (ie, conventional) approaches for use in chemical hazard, exposure, and risk assessments. New approaches ultimately promise to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, resource requirements, and ethical challenges associated with conventional assessment approaches. Despite escalating activity in the field, less common in the 'NAMs' discourse is the consideration of the specific priorities and needs of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. These communities are racialized, marginalized, and low-income communities who face disproportionate health impacts related to environmental contamination. Traditional risk, exposure, and hazard assessment methods have been critiqued as generic, institutionalized, and failing to capture the unique and disproportionate health risks of importance to communities themselves. Despite an understanding of the need to include EJ communities in chemicals management, there remains little to no information on their inclusion in the design of NAMs (which are expected to eventually be adopted for regulatory use). This commentary argues that "now" is the time to ensure that EJ considerations are designed into NAMs, and that EJ communities are meaningfully involved. We separate the paper into sections on exposure, hazard and risk assessment. For each section, we provide some comments on the challenges with conventional methods that have been documented in EJ community contexts, followed by our perspectives on opportunities to build new approaches. We conclude by ideating future directions in three areas: the role of regulatory systems, the design of NAMs for EJ community contexts, and the building of capacity for researchers and EJ communities to collaborate on NAMs design and implementation. With the ultimate goal of more equitable chemicals management, these perspectives and ideas hope to inform the development of EJ community-relevant NAMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag005
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New approach methodologies for contaminant risk assessment in environmental justice communities: let’s not miss the opportunity

Niladri Basu, Katherine Chong, Sophie Emberley-Korkmaz
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
article

New approach methodologies for contaminant risk assessment in environmental justice communities: let’s not miss the opportunity

Niladri Basu, Katherine Chong, Sophie Emberley-Korkmaz
article en

Abstract

New approach methodologies (NAMs) are emergent tools and methods that are increasingly being viewed by the regulatory and scientific community as ones that can support or even replace traditional (ie, conventional) approaches for use in chemical hazard, exposure, and risk assessments. New approaches ultimately promise to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, resource requirements, and ethical challenges associated with conventional assessment approaches. Despite escalating activity in the field, less common in the 'NAMs' discourse is the consideration of the specific priorities and needs of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. These communities are racialized, marginalized, and low-income communities who face disproportionate health impacts related to environmental contamination. Traditional risk, exposure, and hazard assessment methods have been critiqued as generic, institutionalized, and failing to capture the unique and disproportionate health risks of importance to communities themselves. Despite an understanding of the need to include EJ communities in chemicals management, there remains little to no information on their inclusion in the design of NAMs (which are expected to eventually be adopted for regulatory use). This commentary argues that "now" is the time to ensure that EJ considerations are designed into NAMs, and that EJ communities are meaningfully involved. We separate the paper into sections on exposure, hazard and risk assessment. For each section, we provide some comments on the challenges with conventional methods that have been documented in EJ community contexts, followed by our perspectives on opportunities to build new approaches. We conclude by ideating future directions in three areas: the role of regulatory systems, the design of NAMs for EJ community contexts, and the building of capacity for researchers and EJ communities to collaborate on NAMs design and implementation. With the ultimate goal of more equitable chemicals management, these perspectives and ideas hope to inform the development of EJ community-relevant NAMs.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
McGill University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.