Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand for extreme precipitation events: optimising gully watershed strategies

• Insufficient capacity of ecosystem services (ESs) to mitigate damage from extreme precipitation. • SDG progress extremely seriously damaged zone occupied the largest area of the gully watershed. • The reasonableness of the SDG progress damage scores was verified using field research data. • Soil and water conservation measures were not effective in the SDG progress extremely seriously damaged zone. • An approach to assessing SDG progress damage based on ES under extreme weather events was proposed. Extreme precipitation events pose grave threats to human security and sustainable development in gully watersheds. Ecosystem services such as flood mitigation and soil conservation are effective ways to alleviate disasters triggered by severe precipitation. However, current research on the linkage between ecosystem services and damage to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) progress during extreme precipitation events remains limited. This study evaluates the discrepancy between the supply and demand of flood mitigation and soil conservation. This information was integrated with expert knowledge to assess SDG progress damage in gully watersheds. We validated SDG progress damage assessment using field investigations and observational data, analysed spatial clustering of damage scores, and simulated damage changes under different soil and water conservation measures. Results showed that: (1) Soil conservation and flood mitigation supply was significantly lower than demand, with minimum supply–demand ratios of −1.11 (Wayao Gully and Xiaolongmen Gully) and −1.28 (Zhaitang Reservoir), respectively. (2) SDG progress damage exhibited spatial heterogeneity, with the most severely damaged zone having an SDG damage score below −0.92 across all goals, comprising 34% of the total gully watersheds. (3) Higher SDG progress damage correlated with weaker soil and water conservation measures in mitigating this damage. Soil and water conservation measures of slopes greater than 15° and within 210 m of the river bank were identified as optimal for coping with extreme precipitation events. This study proposed a novel approach to assess SDG progress damage based on ecosystem services supply and demand under extreme weather events, providing a valuable reference for climate change adaptation measures in gully watershed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101814
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand for extreme precipitation events: optimising gully watershed strategies

S Zhang, Zihan Xu, Fan Zhang, Jiale Zhang et al.
1 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
36.62
article

Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand for extreme precipitation events: optimising gully watershed strategies

S Zhang, Zihan Xu, Fan Zhang, Jiale Zhang, Ziliang Xi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Insufficient capacity of ecosystem services (ESs) to mitigate damage from extreme precipitation. • SDG progress extremely seriously damaged zone occupied the largest area of the gully watershed. • The reasonableness of the SDG progress damage scores was verified using field research data. • Soil and water conservation measures were not effective in the SDG progress extremely seriously damaged zone. • An approach to assessing SDG progress damage based on ES under extreme weather events was proposed. Extreme precipitation events pose grave threats to human security and sustainable development in gully watersheds. Ecosystem services such as flood mitigation and soil conservation are effective ways to alleviate disasters triggered by severe precipitation. However, current research on the linkage between ecosystem services and damage to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) progress during extreme precipitation events remains limited. This study evaluates the discrepancy between the supply and demand of flood mitigation and soil conservation. This information was integrated with expert knowledge to assess SDG progress damage in gully watersheds. We validated SDG progress damage assessment using field investigations and observational data, analysed spatial clustering of damage scores, and simulated damage changes under different soil and water conservation measures. Results showed that: (1) Soil conservation and flood mitigation supply was significantly lower than demand, with minimum supply–demand ratios of −1.11 (Wayao Gully and Xiaolongmen Gully) and −1.28 (Zhaitang Reservoir), respectively. (2) SDG progress damage exhibited spatial heterogeneity, with the most severely damaged zone having an SDG damage score below −0.92 across all goals, comprising 34% of the total gully watersheds. (3) Higher SDG progress damage correlated with weaker soil and water conservation measures in mitigating this damage. Soil and water conservation measures of slopes greater than 15° and within 210 m of the river bank were identified as optimal for coping with extreme precipitation events. This study proposed a novel approach to assess SDG progress damage based on ecosystem services supply and demand under extreme weather events, providing a valuable reference for climate change adaptation measures in gully watershed.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 77
Beijing Forestry University (CN), Beijing Institute of Water (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.