Considerations for the Adoption of Digital Algorithms and Cardiovascular Decision-Support Tools in Clinical Practice

Early detection of cardiovascular disease and implementation of evidence-based treatments can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Medical algorithms and decision-making tools provide a compelling option for screening, risk prediction, and treatment management. Such digital tools have the potential to aid both healthcare professionals and patients, providing support to decrease unwarranted diagnostic and treatment variability while guiding personalized care, with the overall objective of improving clinical outcomes. However, incorporating digital tools in healthcare settings is challenging, and evidence the required to support their adoption and understand the limitations can be lacking. A multinational panel of expert cardiologists and emergency physicians across North America, Europe, and Oceania gathered to deliberate on the current landscape of digital tools and medical algorithms, drawing on prior clinical experiences and knowledge of country-specific regulations. In this viewpoint, the evidence to support and guide the adoption of digital tools in cardiovascular clinical practice and the necessary components for successful integration into clinical workflows were discussed. Digital tools must be developed with the needs of the healthcare professionals, other relevant stakeholders (eg, administration personnel), and patients in mind to give them the best chance of widespread adoption. Academia, industry, and regulatory bodies should work together to cultivate and accelerate the implementation of digital tools in healthcare. The considerations discussed here may help decision makers to determine if a digital tool has the components necessary to integrate into the clinical workflow successfully.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hpc.0000000000000412
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for the Adoption of Digital Algorithms and Cardiovascular Decision-Support Tools in Clinical Practice

Martin Than, D. John Morrow, Lori B. Daniels, J. Januzzi et al.
Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Considerations for the Adoption of Digital Algorithms and Cardiovascular Decision-Support Tools in Clinical Practice

Martin Than, D. John Morrow, Lori B. Daniels, J. Januzzi, Christopher W. Baugh, Cynthia Papendick, Helena Palau, C. Michael Gibson, Ludovica Visciola, Evangelos Giannitsis, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca
article en

Abstract

Early detection of cardiovascular disease and implementation of evidence-based treatments can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Medical algorithms and decision-making tools provide a compelling option for screening, risk prediction, and treatment management. Such digital tools have the potential to aid both healthcare professionals and patients, providing support to decrease unwarranted diagnostic and treatment variability while guiding personalized care, with the overall objective of improving clinical outcomes. However, incorporating digital tools in healthcare settings is challenging, and evidence the required to support their adoption and understand the limitations can be lacking. A multinational panel of expert cardiologists and emergency physicians across North America, Europe, and Oceania gathered to deliberate on the current landscape of digital tools and medical algorithms, drawing on prior clinical experiences and knowledge of country-specific regulations. In this viewpoint, the evidence to support and guide the adoption of digital tools in cardiovascular clinical practice and the necessary components for successful integration into clinical workflows were discussed. Digital tools must be developed with the needs of the healthcare professionals, other relevant stakeholders (eg, administration personnel), and patients in mind to give them the best chance of widespread adoption. Academia, industry, and regulatory bodies should work together to cultivate and accelerate the implementation of digital tools in healthcare. The considerations discussed here may help decision makers to determine if a digital tool has the components necessary to integrate into the clinical workflow successfully.

Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based MedicineVol. 25(1)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), General Electric (Spain) (ES), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Christchurch Hospital (NZ), Maastricht University (NL), University of California San Diego (US), Women's and Children's Health Network (AU), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (US), SA Health (AU), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.