Investigating the Uncertainty Quantification of Failure of Shallow Foundation of Cohesionless Soils Through Drucker–Prager Constitutive Model and Probabilistic FEM

Uncertainty quantification in science and engineering has become increasingly important due to advances in computational mechanics and numerical simulation techniques. In this work, the relationship between uncertainty in soil material parameters and the variability of failure loads and displacements of a shallow foundation is investigated. A Drucker–Prager constitutive law is implemented within a stochastic finite element framework. The random material variables considered are the critical state line slope c, the unload–reload path slope κ, and the hydraulic permeability k defined by Darcy’s law. The novelty of this work lies in the integrated stochastic u–p finite element framework. The framework combines Drucker–Prager plasticity with spatially varying material properties, and Latin Hypercube Sampling. This approach enables probabilistic prediction of failure loads, displacements, stresses, strains, and limit-state initiation points at reduced computational cost compared to conventional Monte Carlo simulations. Statistical post-processing of the output parameters is performed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The results indicate that, for the investigated configurations, the distributions of failure loads and displacements can be adequately approximated by Gaussian distributions, despite the presence of material nonlinearity. Furthermore, the influence of soil depth and load eccentricity on the limit-state response is quantified within the proposed probabilistic framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotechnics
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics6010006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Uncertainty Quantification of Failure of Shallow Foundation of Cohesionless Soils Through Drucker–Prager Constitutive Model and Probabilistic FEM

Ambrosios-Antonios Savvides
1 citations
Geotechnics
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
35.27
article

Investigating the Uncertainty Quantification of Failure of Shallow Foundation of Cohesionless Soils Through Drucker–Prager Constitutive Model and Probabilistic FEM

Ambrosios-Antonios Savvides
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification in science and engineering has become increasingly important due to advances in computational mechanics and numerical simulation techniques. In this work, the relationship between uncertainty in soil material parameters and the variability of failure loads and displacements of a shallow foundation is investigated. A Drucker–Prager constitutive law is implemented within a stochastic finite element framework. The random material variables considered are the critical state line slope c, the unload–reload path slope κ, and the hydraulic permeability k defined by Darcy’s law. The novelty of this work lies in the integrated stochastic u–p finite element framework. The framework combines Drucker–Prager plasticity with spatially varying material properties, and Latin Hypercube Sampling. This approach enables probabilistic prediction of failure loads, displacements, stresses, strains, and limit-state initiation points at reduced computational cost compared to conventional Monte Carlo simulations. Statistical post-processing of the output parameters is performed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The results indicate that, for the investigated configurations, the distributions of failure loads and displacements can be adequately approximated by Gaussian distributions, despite the presence of material nonlinearity. Furthermore, the influence of soil depth and load eccentricity on the limit-state response is quantified within the proposed probabilistic framework.

GeotechnicsVol. 6(1)
National Technical University of Athens (GR), Hellenic Air Force (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
35.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.