A Multidimensional Assessment Method for Visualization Understanding (MdamV)

How audiences read, interpret, and critique data visualizations is mainly assessed through performance tests featuring tasks like value retrieval. Yet, other factors shown to shape visualization understanding, such as numeracy, graph familiarity, and aesthetic perception, remain underrepresented in existing instruments. To address this, we design and test a Multidimensional Assessment Method for Visualization Understanding (MdamV). This method integrates task-based measures with self-perceived ability ratings and open-ended critique, applied directly to the visualizations being read. Grounded in learning sciences frameworks that view understanding as a multifaceted process, MdamV spans six dimensions: Comprehending, Decoding, Aestheticizing, Critiquing, Reading, and Contextualizing. Validation was supported by a survey (N = 438) representative of Austria's population (ages 18-74, male/female split), using a line chart and a bar chart on climate data. Findings show, for example, that about a quarter of respondents indicate deficits in comprehending simple data units, roughly one in five people felt unfamiliar with each chart type, and self-assessed numeracy was significantly related to data reading performance (p = 0.0004). Overall, the evaluation of MdamV demonstrates the value of assessing visualization understanding beyond performance, framing it as a situated process tied to particular visualizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2026.3653265
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
93.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multidimensional Assessment Method for Visualization Understanding (MdamV)

Sylvia Kritzinger, Torsten Möller, Judith Staudner, Antonia Saske et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Data Visualization and Analytics
93.68
article

A Multidimensional Assessment Method for Visualization Understanding (MdamV)

Sylvia Kritzinger, Torsten Möller, Judith Staudner, Antonia Saske, Laura Koesten
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How audiences read, interpret, and critique data visualizations is mainly assessed through performance tests featuring tasks like value retrieval. Yet, other factors shown to shape visualization understanding, such as numeracy, graph familiarity, and aesthetic perception, remain underrepresented in existing instruments. To address this, we design and test a Multidimensional Assessment Method for Visualization Understanding (MdamV). This method integrates task-based measures with self-perceived ability ratings and open-ended critique, applied directly to the visualizations being read. Grounded in learning sciences frameworks that view understanding as a multifaceted process, MdamV spans six dimensions: Comprehending, Decoding, Aestheticizing, Critiquing, Reading, and Contextualizing. Validation was supported by a survey (N = 438) representative of Austria's population (ages 18-74, male/female split), using a line chart and a bar chart on climate data. Findings show, for example, that about a quarter of respondents indicate deficits in comprehending simple data units, roughly one in five people felt unfamiliar with each chart type, and self-assessed numeracy was significantly related to data reading performance (p = 0.0004). Overall, the evaluation of MdamV demonstrates the value of assessing visualization understanding beyond performance, framing it as a situated process tied to particular visualizations.

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsVol. 32(3)
University of Vienna (AT), Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Data Visualization and Analytics
93.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.