Salvage Interstitial Brachytherapy for Isolated Local Recurrence of Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Stratified by Type of Pelvic Irradiation History

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of salvage interstitial brachytherapy (S-ISBT) for isolated local recurrence (ILR) of cervical and endometrial carcinoma, stratifying patients by pelvic irradiation history (PIH). <b>Methods</b>: Patients with ILR treated with S-ISBT were retrospectively reviewed and categorized by initial treatment: Group A (surgery alone); Group B (surgery + postoperative radiotherapy (RT)); and Group C (definitive RT). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) rates, and the cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) for Grade ≥ 3 late adverse events (AEs) were estimated. Multivariate analysis identified prognostic factors. <b>Results</b>: The study included 70 patients (A: 28, B: 17, C: 25) with a median follow-up of 33.4 months. The 3-year OS, PFS, LC, and CIFs for Grade ≥ 3 late AEs for Groups A, B, and C were 80.8%, 66.7%, and 30.4% (<i>p</i> < 0.001); 56.4%, 41.5%, and 11.6% (<i>p</i> < 0.001); 89.1%, 61.4%, and 43.0% (<i>p</i> = 0.002); and 26.4%, 13.3%, and 32.0% (<i>p</i> = 0.40), respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested the type of PIH, disease-free interval, and tumor volume as independent prognostic factors. While no significant differences were observed between Groups A and B (OS: HR = 0.47, <i>p</i> = 0.19; PFS: HR = 0.60, <i>p</i> = 0.28), Group C exhibited a significantly higher risk than Group B (OS: HR = 3.08, <i>p</i> = 0.018; PFS: HR = 3.41, <i>p</i> = 0.004). <b>Conclusions</b>: S-ISBT could be considered for patients with prior postoperative RT, whose outcomes are significantly better than those with prior definitive RT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020252
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Salvage Interstitial Brachytherapy for Isolated Local Recurrence of Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Stratified by Type of Pelvic Irradiation History

Sari Nakao, Yuri Tenjimbayashi, Keiichiro Baba, Taisuke Sumiya et al.
Cancers
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Salvage Interstitial Brachytherapy for Isolated Local Recurrence of Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Stratified by Type of Pelvic Irradiation History

Sari Nakao, Yuri Tenjimbayashi, Keiichiro Baba, Taisuke Sumiya, A. Shikama, Toyomi Satoh, Azusa Akiyama, Masashi Mizumoto, Den Fujioka, Haruko Numajiri, Motohiro Murakami, Hideyuki Sakurai, Kei Nakai, Hiroya Itagaki, Takashi Saito
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of salvage interstitial brachytherapy (S-ISBT) for isolated local recurrence (ILR) of cervical and endometrial carcinoma, stratifying patients by pelvic irradiation history (PIH). <b>Methods</b>: Patients with ILR treated with S-ISBT were retrospectively reviewed and categorized by initial treatment: Group A (surgery alone); Group B (surgery + postoperative radiotherapy (RT)); and Group C (definitive RT). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) rates, and the cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) for Grade ≥ 3 late adverse events (AEs) were estimated. Multivariate analysis identified prognostic factors. <b>Results</b>: The study included 70 patients (A: 28, B: 17, C: 25) with a median follow-up of 33.4 months. The 3-year OS, PFS, LC, and CIFs for Grade ≥ 3 late AEs for Groups A, B, and C were 80.8%, 66.7%, and 30.4% (<i>p</i> < 0.001); 56.4%, 41.5%, and 11.6% (<i>p</i> < 0.001); 89.1%, 61.4%, and 43.0% (<i>p</i> = 0.002); and 26.4%, 13.3%, and 32.0% (<i>p</i> = 0.40), respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested the type of PIH, disease-free interval, and tumor volume as independent prognostic factors. While no significant differences were observed between Groups A and B (OS: HR = 0.47, <i>p</i> = 0.19; PFS: HR = 0.60, <i>p</i> = 0.28), Group C exhibited a significantly higher risk than Group B (OS: HR = 3.08, <i>p</i> = 0.018; PFS: HR = 3.41, <i>p</i> = 0.004). <b>Conclusions</b>: S-ISBT could be considered for patients with prior postoperative RT, whose outcomes are significantly better than those with prior definitive RT.

CancersVol. 18(2)
University of Tsukuba (JP), University of Tsukuba Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.