Correction to ‘Effects of Menthol on Thirst During Surgery Patients Fasting: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies’

We thank the reader for their insightful comments on our systematic review and meta-analysis entitled 'Effects of menthol on thirst during surgery patients fasting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies' (Wang et al., 2025).We provide the following responses and corrections to the reader's comments.In response to the reader's comments, we first note that all included studies in our research reported obtaining appropriate ethical approvals and informed consent.We next reviewed the original literature.The study by Garcia et al. (2019) included participants aged 12-65 years, while our systematic review's inclusion criteria specified adult patients ( 18 years).We attempted to contact the original authors via email to obtain the raw data for reanalysis; however, we regrettably did not receive a response from the authors of Garcia et al. (2019).Consequently, we have excluded the study by Garcia et al.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70100
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction to ‘Effects of Menthol on Thirst During Surgery Patients Fasting: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies’

International Journal of Nursing Practice
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Correction to ‘Effects of Menthol on Thirst During Surgery Patients Fasting: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies’

article en

Abstract

We thank the reader for their insightful comments on our systematic review and meta-analysis entitled 'Effects of menthol on thirst during surgery patients fasting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies' (Wang et al., 2025).We provide the following responses and corrections to the reader's comments.In response to the reader's comments, we first note that all included studies in our research reported obtaining appropriate ethical approvals and informed consent.We next reviewed the original literature.The study by Garcia et al. (2019) included participants aged 12-65 years, while our systematic review's inclusion criteria specified adult patients ( 18 years).We attempted to contact the original authors via email to obtain the raw data for reanalysis; however, we regrettably did not receive a response from the authors of Garcia et al. (2019).Consequently, we have excluded the study by Garcia et al.

International Journal of Nursing PracticeVol. 32(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.