Gender quota, and intersectional presence and power: The politics of prototypicality

Abstract While electoral gender quota have successfully increased the numerical presence of women in many parliaments worldwide, questions remain about who gains access and who remains excluded. Furthermore, most research continues to focus on gender alone, overlooking how intersecting identities, such as migration background, education, and age, shape unequal opportunities for political participation and power. This study offers an intersectional and longitudinal examination of the composition and career trajectories of members of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives from 1991 to 2024 (N = 1,250). Our findings reveal that while electoral gender quota increase women’s representation, they primarily benefit prototypical women, leaving dominant male elites largely unaffected. We additionally distinguish between intersectional presence and power, showing that non-prototypical Member of Parliament, also men, face persistent barriers to leadership and career longevity. This leads to the conclusion that quota gains remain fragile unless they are coupled to institutional changes that convert presence into power for non-prototypical Member of Parliament.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaf059
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender quota, and intersectional presence and power: The politics of prototypicality

Karen Celis, Robin Devroe
Parliamentary Affairs
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Gender quota, and intersectional presence and power: The politics of prototypicality

Karen Celis, Robin Devroe
article en

Abstract

Abstract While electoral gender quota have successfully increased the numerical presence of women in many parliaments worldwide, questions remain about who gains access and who remains excluded. Furthermore, most research continues to focus on gender alone, overlooking how intersecting identities, such as migration background, education, and age, shape unequal opportunities for political participation and power. This study offers an intersectional and longitudinal examination of the composition and career trajectories of members of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives from 1991 to 2024 (N = 1,250). Our findings reveal that while electoral gender quota increase women’s representation, they primarily benefit prototypical women, leaving dominant male elites largely unaffected. We additionally distinguish between intersectional presence and power, showing that non-prototypical Member of Parliament, also men, face persistent barriers to leadership and career longevity. This leads to the conclusion that quota gains remain fragile unless they are coupled to institutional changes that convert presence into power for non-prototypical Member of Parliament.

Parliamentary Affairs
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender quota, and intersectional presence and power: The politics of prototypicality — Karen Celis, Robin Devroe · Parliamentary Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS