Prospective Evaluation of Motion Correction Software for <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET of the Brain

In this study, we aimed to quantify the impact of data-driven motion-correction reconstruction for PET imaging on still and motion-corrupted <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET brain scans of children and adolescents. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective study, participants underwent a 9-min PET brain scan after clinically indicated whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT between December 2022 and March 2023. Participants remained still during minutes 1-6 and performed scripted head movements during minutes 7-9. PET images were reconstructed from list-mode data into still (minutes 1-6) and mixed still/motion-corrupted (minutes 4-9) datasets, with and without motion correction. Three radiologists independently assessed image quality, gray and white matter differentiation, basal ganglia definition, and cortical uniformity. Quantitative parameters of the brain (SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub>) were obtained by a separate observer. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences between reconstructions and motion groups. <b>Results:</b> Sixteen participants (mean age, 13 ± 3 y; 8 males and 8 females) were included. Still images with motion correction scored higher than still images without motion correction for overall image quality (<i>P</i> = 0.013). Motion-corrupted images with motion correction outperformed still images without motion correction in gray and white matter contrast, basal ganglia delineation, and cortical uniformity (<i>P</i> < 0.018). Quantitatively, motion-corrected images did not significantly differ from still images without motion correction. <b>Conclusion:</b> Motion correction software improved the image quality of motion-corrupted <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT brain scans. Corrected scans were qualitatively superior or did not differ from non-motion-corrected images, with no impact on quantitative measurements. Motion correction has the potential to allow awake, nonsedated pediatric patients to undergo PET scans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.270793
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Evaluation of Motion Correction Software for 18 F-FDG PET of the Brain

Samuel L. Brady, Nadeen Abu Ata, Joseph Meier, Susan E. Sharp et al.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Prospective Evaluation of Motion Correction Software for 18 F-FDG PET of the Brain

Samuel L. Brady, Nadeen Abu Ata, Joseph Meier, Susan E. Sharp, Andrew T. Trout, Bin Zhang, Melissa Burkett, Matthew G. Spangler-Bickell, Joseph MacLean, Vinicius de Padua V. Alves
article en

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to quantify the impact of data-driven motion-correction reconstruction for PET imaging on still and motion-corrupted <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET brain scans of children and adolescents. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective study, participants underwent a 9-min PET brain scan after clinically indicated whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT between December 2022 and March 2023. Participants remained still during minutes 1-6 and performed scripted head movements during minutes 7-9. PET images were reconstructed from list-mode data into still (minutes 1-6) and mixed still/motion-corrupted (minutes 4-9) datasets, with and without motion correction. Three radiologists independently assessed image quality, gray and white matter differentiation, basal ganglia definition, and cortical uniformity. Quantitative parameters of the brain (SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub>) were obtained by a separate observer. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences between reconstructions and motion groups. <b>Results:</b> Sixteen participants (mean age, 13 ± 3 y; 8 males and 8 females) were included. Still images with motion correction scored higher than still images without motion correction for overall image quality (<i>P</i> = 0.013). Motion-corrupted images with motion correction outperformed still images without motion correction in gray and white matter contrast, basal ganglia delineation, and cortical uniformity (<i>P</i> < 0.018). Quantitatively, motion-corrected images did not significantly differ from still images without motion correction. <b>Conclusion:</b> Motion correction software improved the image quality of motion-corrupted <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT brain scans. Corrected scans were qualitatively superior or did not differ from non-motion-corrected images, with no impact on quantitative measurements. Motion correction has the potential to allow awake, nonsedated pediatric patients to undergo PET scans.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine TechnologyVol. 54(1)
Northwestern University (US), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), General Electric (Spain) (ES), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.