Modulation Analysis of Monovector and Multivector Predictive Control of Five-Phase Drives

The Finite State Model Predictive Control (FSMPC) of variable speed drives is the subject of many works in the recent literature. Many variants of FSMPC exist, each aiming at an aspect such as the complexity of the cost function, switching frequency, current quality, etc. In the case of multiphase drives, two popular variants are the monovector and multivector techniques. Despite past efforts to compare different techniques, the field must still reach a consensus regarding the relative merits of each one. This paper presents a new method to compare two families of FSMPC. The method is based on a reduced set of figures of merit using the current modulation index as the variable. The comparison is made for the equal usage of the power converter in terms of commutations. The results point to better values for the figures of merit for the monovector that, in addition, portrays more flexibility and better DC link usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modelling—International Open Access Journal of Modelling in Engineering Science
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7010017
Primary Topic
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modulation Analysis of Monovector and Multivector Predictive Control of Five-Phase Drives

Manuel G. Satué, Juana M. Martínez-Heredia, José L. Mora
Modelling—International Open Access Journal of Modelling in Engineering Science
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
article

Modulation Analysis of Monovector and Multivector Predictive Control of Five-Phase Drives

Manuel G. Satué, Juana M. Martínez-Heredia, José L. Mora
article en

Abstract

The Finite State Model Predictive Control (FSMPC) of variable speed drives is the subject of many works in the recent literature. Many variants of FSMPC exist, each aiming at an aspect such as the complexity of the cost function, switching frequency, current quality, etc. In the case of multiphase drives, two popular variants are the monovector and multivector techniques. Despite past efforts to compare different techniques, the field must still reach a consensus regarding the relative merits of each one. This paper presents a new method to compare two families of FSMPC. The method is based on a reduced set of figures of merit using the current modulation index as the variable. The comparison is made for the equal usage of the power converter in terms of commutations. The results point to better values for the figures of merit for the monovector that, in addition, portrays more flexibility and better DC link usage.

Modelling—International Open Access Journal of Modelling in Engineering ScienceVol. 7(1)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modulation Analysis of Monovector and Multivector Predictive Control of Five-Phase Drives — Manuel G. Satué, Juana M. Martínez-Heredia, et al. · Modelling—International Open Access Journal of Modelling in Engineering Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS