Ancestry gaps in cardiovascular GWAS: a multi-database review of African representation in genomic studies

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, claiming millions of lives each year. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of CVD-associated variants and have created the foundation for risk assessment and prevention through genetic testing. However, despite all the progress in understanding cardiovascular genomics, our genetic research and findings are overwhelmingly skewed towards individuals of European ancestry. This fact has limited our understanding and effectiveness for the diagnosis and treatment of CVDs in underrepresented populations, such as individuals of African ancestry. This gap is especially consequential because African ancestry populations harbor the greatest global genetic diversity, with variant frequencies and haplotypes that are often poorly captured by current reference datasets. In this review, we highlight recent efforts to understand the effectiveness of current tools in accurately diagnosing and treating CVDs in individuals of African ancestry compared to other populations. Additionally, we also performed a multi-database analysis to explore the persistent diversity gap in cardiovascular genetics. In doing so, we aim to raise awareness about the ancestry gaps faced in disease genomic research, supported by recent findings and the current landscape of our genetic databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1647176
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ancestry gaps in cardiovascular GWAS: a multi-database review of African representation in genomic studies

Alejandro Rivera-Madera, Diego Pomales-Matos, Mac Lyerly, Oswaldo L. Echevarría-Bonilla et al.
Frontiers in Genetics
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Ancestry gaps in cardiovascular GWAS: a multi-database review of African representation in genomic studies

Alejandro Rivera-Madera, Diego Pomales-Matos, Mac Lyerly, Oswaldo L. Echevarría-Bonilla, Miguel Alvarez-Cortes, Edwin Peña-Martínez, Saul E. Henriquez-Quiñones, Giselle M. Reyes-Sosa, Rafael A. Villanueva-Nogueras
article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, claiming millions of lives each year. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of CVD-associated variants and have created the foundation for risk assessment and prevention through genetic testing. However, despite all the progress in understanding cardiovascular genomics, our genetic research and findings are overwhelmingly skewed towards individuals of European ancestry. This fact has limited our understanding and effectiveness for the diagnosis and treatment of CVDs in underrepresented populations, such as individuals of African ancestry. This gap is especially consequential because African ancestry populations harbor the greatest global genetic diversity, with variant frequencies and haplotypes that are often poorly captured by current reference datasets. In this review, we highlight recent efforts to understand the effectiveness of current tools in accurately diagnosing and treating CVDs in individuals of African ancestry compared to other populations. Additionally, we also performed a multi-database analysis to explore the persistent diversity gap in cardiovascular genetics. In doing so, we aim to raise awareness about the ancestry gaps faced in disease genomic research, supported by recent findings and the current landscape of our genetic databases.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 16
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus (PR), University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR), Central University of the Caribbean (PR), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Chicago (US), Caribbean University (PR), Wake Forest University (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.