Gender, names, and numbers: Recovering a national community of women scientists, 1975-2000

Introduction. Databases of scientific publications are not only tools for researchers, but also become available sources for reconstructing scientific communities in the history of science and technology. A world of names of knowledgeable people in research and academia has been constructed from databases that rely on the association between authorship and authority. In this system of recognition, gender has been either absent or simply ignored, stabilizing male authority. Objective and methodology. With the aim of reconstructing a community of Spanish women microbiologists, we explore the presence of these women in the publication database Web of Science (WoS) and two specialised Spanish journals between 1975 and 2000. Results. A list of 33 women belonging to the scientific community of interest resulted from this endeavour. From this search process, we discuss the gender issues embodied in the sources available and analyse the related challenges and the methods and resources we employed. Our research highlights the concealed gender issues relating to the WoS, as well as the exclusion of many journals, particularly those published in languages other than English. We overcame these limitations by both utilising tools provided by the database and retrieving the scientific recognition given to women as authors in two Spanish journals. This experience of reconstructing collectives by focusing on women thus embodies a reflection on the sources used to identify women and the collectives in which they worked. A set of sources were identified, and the relationships developed between these sources enabled us to unveil the geopolitics of scientific authority through authorship and to reconstruct a gendered scientific community. Conclusions. This essay proposes a methodological approach in which limitations, such as the quantification of productivity and the association between authorship and authority, have been problematised yet sufficiently overcome to accomplish our objective. Instead of avoiding their use, a critical look at the construction of these sources has allowed us to recommend a useful methodology that challenges these limitations from within.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Investigaciones Feministas
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.91680
Primary Topic
History of Science and Natural History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender, names, and numbers: Recovering a national community of women scientists, 1975-2000

Marı́a Jesús Santesmases, Isabel María Gómez Rodríguez
Investigaciones Feministas
History of Science and Natural History
article

Gender, names, and numbers: Recovering a national community of women scientists, 1975-2000

Marı́a Jesús Santesmases, Isabel María Gómez Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Databases of scientific publications are not only tools for researchers, but also become available sources for reconstructing scientific communities in the history of science and technology. A world of names of knowledgeable people in research and academia has been constructed from databases that rely on the association between authorship and authority. In this system of recognition, gender has been either absent or simply ignored, stabilizing male authority. Objective and methodology. With the aim of reconstructing a community of Spanish women microbiologists, we explore the presence of these women in the publication database Web of Science (WoS) and two specialised Spanish journals between 1975 and 2000. Results. A list of 33 women belonging to the scientific community of interest resulted from this endeavour. From this search process, we discuss the gender issues embodied in the sources available and analyse the related challenges and the methods and resources we employed. Our research highlights the concealed gender issues relating to the WoS, as well as the exclusion of many journals, particularly those published in languages other than English. We overcame these limitations by both utilising tools provided by the database and retrieving the scientific recognition given to women as authors in two Spanish journals. This experience of reconstructing collectives by focusing on women thus embodies a reflection on the sources used to identify women and the collectives in which they worked. A set of sources were identified, and the relationships developed between these sources enabled us to unveil the geopolitics of scientific authority through authorship and to reconstruct a gendered scientific community. Conclusions. This essay proposes a methodological approach in which limitations, such as the quantification of productivity and the association between authorship and authority, have been problematised yet sufficiently overcome to accomplish our objective. Instead of avoiding their use, a critical look at the construction of these sources has allowed us to recommend a useful methodology that challenges these limitations from within.

Investigaciones FeministasVol. 16(1)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Unidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Norges Forskningsråd
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
History of Science and Natural History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.