A comprehensive analysis of dry eye disease clinical trials (2000–2024): research trends and gaps
These commonly used endpoints vary in psychometric validity and standardization, which can undermine data quality, complicate analysis and interpretation of individual trial results, and limit cross-trial comparability. Overall, the ecosystem appears mature but conservative, emphasizing later-phase, single-agent studies, traditional endpoints, and limited severity stratification and geographic diversity. Future trials should prespecify severity and subtype strata, use validated mechanism-aligned endpoints with standardized assessment windows and longer follow-up, and broaden geographic representation to improve generalizability and cross-trial comparability.
Authors
- Haotian Peng
- Xiaohui Jiang
- Nanxin Wu
- Boyue Xu
- Ruxin Xu
- Shudong Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7158-0524)
- Yun-e Zhao
Institutions
- Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College (CN)
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN)
- National Clinical Research (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Published
- 2026-01-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1713433
- Primary Topic
- Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China