Rethinking the evidence for a liquid–liquid transition in water: What decompression experiments reveal

The possibility of a liquid-liquid transition (LLT) in supercooled water has sparked decades of debate. Recent pump-probe experiments interpret two peaks in the structure factor S(q) during and after decompression of high-density liquid (HDL) as evidence of coexistence with low-density liquid (LDL). However, this interpretation presents a fundamental puzzle: such coexistence is implausible at ambient pressure, below the estimated location of the liquid-liquid critical point (LLCP). Here, we use decompression simulations with ML-BOP to reconcile this contradiction. Even when water decompresses along the LLT, S(q) retains a single peak because HDL and LDL domains remain nanoscopic. We explain the two-peak S(q) observed experimentally as a single evolving liquid peak superimposed on a slower to respond, colder HDL arising from the temperature gradient across the sample. The simulations reveal that the decisive LLT signature is a transient growth and decay of the apparent correlation length ξ at low q, which emerges only when decompression proceeds along the LLT, with maximum ξ near the LLCP. Importantly, ξ remains low when decompressing from T ≥ Tc, or too rapidly. The experimental signatures could be explained by an exponential pressure drop to the LLT in ∼10 ns, the growth of ξ as LDL domains develop, peaking near the LLCP at ∼50 ns, and subsequent entry into the single-phase regime, from which crystallization proceeds. Our findings resolve the contradiction between the LLCP location and structural signatures, identifying the low q region of S(q) evolution-not peak splitting-as the key structural marker of the LLT in water.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0304941
Primary Topic
Material Dynamics and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the evidence for a liquid–liquid transition in water: What decompression experiments reveal

Ingrid de Almeida Ribeiro, Valeria Paula Molinero, Debdas Dhabal, Rajat Kumar
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Material Dynamics and Properties
article

Rethinking the evidence for a liquid–liquid transition in water: What decompression experiments reveal

Ingrid de Almeida Ribeiro, Valeria Paula Molinero, Debdas Dhabal, Rajat Kumar
article en

Abstract

The possibility of a liquid-liquid transition (LLT) in supercooled water has sparked decades of debate. Recent pump-probe experiments interpret two peaks in the structure factor S(q) during and after decompression of high-density liquid (HDL) as evidence of coexistence with low-density liquid (LDL). However, this interpretation presents a fundamental puzzle: such coexistence is implausible at ambient pressure, below the estimated location of the liquid-liquid critical point (LLCP). Here, we use decompression simulations with ML-BOP to reconcile this contradiction. Even when water decompresses along the LLT, S(q) retains a single peak because HDL and LDL domains remain nanoscopic. We explain the two-peak S(q) observed experimentally as a single evolving liquid peak superimposed on a slower to respond, colder HDL arising from the temperature gradient across the sample. The simulations reveal that the decisive LLT signature is a transient growth and decay of the apparent correlation length ξ at low q, which emerges only when decompression proceeds along the LLT, with maximum ξ near the LLCP. Importantly, ξ remains low when decompressing from T ≥ Tc, or too rapidly. The experimental signatures could be explained by an exponential pressure drop to the LLT in ∼10 ns, the growth of ξ as LDL domains develop, peaking near the LLCP at ∼50 ns, and subsequent entry into the single-phase regime, from which crystallization proceeds. Our findings resolve the contradiction between the LLCP location and structural signatures, identifying the low q region of S(q) evolution-not peak splitting-as the key structural marker of the LLT in water.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 164(2)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), University of Utah (US), Indian Institute of Information Technology Guwahati (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Material Dynamics and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking the evidence for a liquid–liquid transition in water: What decompression experiments reveal — Ingrid de Almeida Ribeiro, Valeria Paula Molinero, et al. · The Journal of Chemical Physics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS