Identifying Bots Through LLM-Generated Text in Open Narrative Responses: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Online survey participants are frequently recruited through social media platforms, opt-in online access panels, and river sampling approaches. Such online surveys are threatened by bots that shift survey outcomes and exploit incentives. In this proof-of-concept study, we advance the identification of bots driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) through the prediction of LLM-generated text in open narrative responses. We conducted an online survey on same-gender partnerships, including three open narrative questions, and recruited 1512 participants through Facebook. In addition, we utilized two LLM-driven bots, each of which responded to the open narrative questions 400 times. Open narrative responses synthesized by our bots were labeled as containing LLM-generated text (“yes”). Facebook responses were assigned a proxy label (“unclear”) as they may contain bots themselves. Using this binary label as ground truth, we fine-tuned prediction models relying on the “Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers” (BERT) model, resulting in an impressive prediction performance: The models accurately identified between 97% and 100% of bot responses. However, prediction performance decreases if the models make predictions about questions they were not fine-tuned with. Our study contributes to the ongoing discussion on bots and extends the methodological toolkit for protecting the quality and integrity of online survey data.
Authors
- Anna‐Carolina Haensch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-0393)
- Ruben L. Bach (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-2829)
- Joshua Claassen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5492-4439)
- Jan Karem Höhne
Institutions
- Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Social Science Computer Review
- Published
- 2026-01-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251408022
- Primary Topic
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00