Present at the invasion: issue ownership, party competition and the politicisation of the Ukraine War

Why has assistance to Ukraine become politically contentious in some countries more than others? Much attention has been paid to the role of populist opposition parties in seeking to politicise the issue, especially as citizens have become less willing to bear the costs involved. But not all populist actors have challenged Ukraine policy in this way. This article argues that the decision to politicise depends on the extent of previous co-optation to the liberal mainstream position prior to the onset of war fatigue. Looking empirically at the cases of Poland and the United Kingdom, it shows how populist presence in government at the time of Russia’s invasion incentivised these parties to articulate a pro-assistance line which reduced their subsequent ability to politicise the issue at a later date. The findings help us understand how distinct sources of politicisation interact and highlight the importance of sequencing and<br/>other temporal considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2616335
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
64.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Present at the invasion: issue ownership, party competition and the politicisation of the Ukraine War

Benjamin Martill
1 citations
Journal of European Integration
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
64.82
article

Present at the invasion: issue ownership, party competition and the politicisation of the Ukraine War

Benjamin Martill
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Why has assistance to Ukraine become politically contentious in some countries more than others? Much attention has been paid to the role of populist opposition parties in seeking to politicise the issue, especially as citizens have become less willing to bear the costs involved. But not all populist actors have challenged Ukraine policy in this way. This article argues that the decision to politicise depends on the extent of previous co-optation to the liberal mainstream position prior to the onset of war fatigue. Looking empirically at the cases of Poland and the United Kingdom, it shows how populist presence in government at the time of Russia’s invasion incentivised these parties to articulate a pro-assistance line which reduced their subsequent ability to politicise the issue at a later date. The findings help us understand how distinct sources of politicisation interact and highlight the importance of sequencing and<br/>other temporal considerations.

Journal of European IntegrationVol. 48(2)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
64.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.