Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk Assessment in Beedi Workers Using RULA and OCRA Checklist: A Cross Sectional Study

Abstract Background: Beedi rolling is a highly repetitive occupation characterized by prolonged static postures and forceful hand movements, making workers vulnerable to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs). The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in beedi workers ranges from 34.6% to 87.0% across different populations. Objective: To assess occupational ergonomic risk factors in beedi workers using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA) Checklist, and to identify the correlation between assessment methods and symptom prevalence. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 320 beedi workers (mean age 40.6 ± 12.29 years) from urban beedi rolling units. Ergonomic assessments were performed using RULA (scores 1–7) and OCRA Checklist (Green/Yellow/Red/Purple categories). Musculoskeletal symptom prevalence was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Postural analysis was conducted through direct observation and video recording during work cycles. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests for categorical associations, and Pearson correlation for assessment method comparison. Results: RULA assessment identified 50% of workers in high-risk category (scores 5–7), 35% in medium-risk (scores 3–4), and 15% in low-risk (scores 1–2). OCRA Checklist revealed 65% of workers in red/purple risk categories combined (medium-to-high risk), indicating significant repetitive strain exposure. Overall musculoskeletal symptom prevalence was 63.4% (n=203), with lower back (60%) and knee (50%) regions most commonly affected. Strong correlation existed between RULA scores and symptom prevalence (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and between OCRA risk categories and upper extremity symptoms (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). Occupational duration significantly influenced risk levels; workers with >25 years experience showed 42% symptom prevalence compared to 7% in those with <5 years (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Both RULA and OCRA Checklist demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting ergonomic risk factors in beedi workers. The combination of these assessment methods provided comprehensive evaluation of upper extremity and postural risks. Significant WRMSDs burden necessitates immediate implementation of ergonomic interventions including workstation modification, task rotation, and regular rest intervals to reduce occupational health hazards in this vulnerable population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18214863
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk Assessment in Beedi Workers Using RULA and OCRA Checklist: A Cross Sectional Study

P. Muthukrishnan, G. Kalai Priya
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Risk Assessment in Beedi Workers Using RULA and OCRA Checklist: A Cross Sectional Study

P. Muthukrishnan, G. Kalai Priya
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Beedi rolling is a highly repetitive occupation characterized by prolonged static postures and forceful hand movements, making workers vulnerable to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs). The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in beedi workers ranges from 34.6% to 87.0% across different populations. Objective: To assess occupational ergonomic risk factors in beedi workers using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA) Checklist, and to identify the correlation between assessment methods and symptom prevalence. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 320 beedi workers (mean age 40.6 ± 12.29 years) from urban beedi rolling units. Ergonomic assessments were performed using RULA (scores 1–7) and OCRA Checklist (Green/Yellow/Red/Purple categories). Musculoskeletal symptom prevalence was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Postural analysis was conducted through direct observation and video recording during work cycles. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests for categorical associations, and Pearson correlation for assessment method comparison. Results: RULA assessment identified 50% of workers in high-risk category (scores 5–7), 35% in medium-risk (scores 3–4), and 15% in low-risk (scores 1–2). OCRA Checklist revealed 65% of workers in red/purple risk categories combined (medium-to-high risk), indicating significant repetitive strain exposure. Overall musculoskeletal symptom prevalence was 63.4% (n=203), with lower back (60%) and knee (50%) regions most commonly affected. Strong correlation existed between RULA scores and symptom prevalence (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and between OCRA risk categories and upper extremity symptoms (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). Occupational duration significantly influenced risk levels; workers with >25 years experience showed 42% symptom prevalence compared to 7% in those with <5 years (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Both RULA and OCRA Checklist demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting ergonomic risk factors in beedi workers. The combination of these assessment methods provided comprehensive evaluation of upper extremity and postural risks. Significant WRMSDs burden necessitates immediate implementation of ergonomic interventions including workstation modification, task rotation, and regular rest intervals to reduce occupational health hazards in this vulnerable population.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN), Physiotherapy New Zealand (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.