Practicing What We Preach: Walkthroughs as Formative Assessments

Classroom walkthroughs have traditionally been used as supervisory tools, with principals as evaluators who monitor teacher performance and compliance with “best practices” checklists. Recent scholarship reconceptualizes walkthroughs as formative processes that can support learning for teachers, leaders, and students. This conceptual paper examines how formative classroom walkthroughs (FCWs), as articulated by Moss and Brookhart, align with the International Baccalaureate’s (IB) assessment principles and practices. The IB assessment framework emphasizes not only assessment for learning, but also the use of constructive feedback, positive backwash on teaching, fostering learner agency, and alignment with the learner profile. These features are integral to the IB’s philosophy, ensuring that assessment practices are learner-centered and support both student growth and instructional improvement. Moss and Brookhart’s FCW model puts these IB principles into practice through brief, targeted observations that focus on students’ learning targets, success criteria, demonstrations of understanding, formative feedback, and opportunities for self-assessment. By correlating IB assessment guiding principles with the components of FCWs, this paper proposes a conceptual alignment model and a correlation matrix. These demonstrate how walkthroughs can “practice what we preach” by serving as formative assessments rather than evaluative checklists and illustrate why Moss and Brookhart’s version of walkthroughs is more compatible with IB than traditional approaches. From a communities-of-practice perspective, this paper argues that FCWs should serve as ongoing, collaborative learning opportunities for IB stakeholders rather than isolated compliance checks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17933830
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practicing What We Preach: Walkthroughs as Formative Assessments

Ann Gaillard
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Practicing What We Preach: Walkthroughs as Formative Assessments

Ann Gaillard
article en

Abstract

Classroom walkthroughs have traditionally been used as supervisory tools, with principals as evaluators who monitor teacher performance and compliance with “best practices” checklists. Recent scholarship reconceptualizes walkthroughs as formative processes that can support learning for teachers, leaders, and students. This conceptual paper examines how formative classroom walkthroughs (FCWs), as articulated by Moss and Brookhart, align with the International Baccalaureate’s (IB) assessment principles and practices. The IB assessment framework emphasizes not only assessment for learning, but also the use of constructive feedback, positive backwash on teaching, fostering learner agency, and alignment with the learner profile. These features are integral to the IB’s philosophy, ensuring that assessment practices are learner-centered and support both student growth and instructional improvement. Moss and Brookhart’s FCW model puts these IB principles into practice through brief, targeted observations that focus on students’ learning targets, success criteria, demonstrations of understanding, formative feedback, and opportunities for self-assessment. By correlating IB assessment guiding principles with the components of FCWs, this paper proposes a conceptual alignment model and a correlation matrix. These demonstrate how walkthroughs can “practice what we preach” by serving as formative assessments rather than evaluative checklists and illustrate why Moss and Brookhart’s version of walkthroughs is more compatible with IB than traditional approaches. From a communities-of-practice perspective, this paper argues that FCWs should serve as ongoing, collaborative learning opportunities for IB stakeholders rather than isolated compliance checks.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Institute for Educational Leadership (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.