Advocating for good? Individual-level political predictors of attitudes toward corporate sociopolitical activism

Organizations are increasingly engaging in and taking a stance on public debates about controversial sociopolitical issues. This study explores how stakeholders’ political predispositions (i.e., political orientation and political trust) and contextual attitudes (i.e., societal issue salience and CSA skepticism) shape their attitudes toward CSA. The results of a preregistered representative survey in the Netherlands (<i>N</i> = 1,863) showed that stakeholder attitudes toward CSA are more positive when individuals identify less as conservative, trust political institutions more, and are more aware of major social (as opposed to economic or safety-related) issues. Moreover, we found an interaction effect between CSA skepticism and social issue salience on attitudes toward CSA: CSA attitudes become more positive with increasing social issue salience among highly skeptical individuals than among those with moderate or low CSA skepticism. These findings improve our understanding of the determinants of overall (favorable) evaluations of CSA across organizations and issue domains.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.115988
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advocating for good? Individual-level political predictors of attitudes toward corporate sociopolitical activism

Sarah Marschlich, Britta C. Brugman, Olga Eisele, Sonia Jawaid Shaikh
Journal of Business Research
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Advocating for good? Individual-level political predictors of attitudes toward corporate sociopolitical activism

Sarah Marschlich, Britta C. Brugman, Olga Eisele, Sonia Jawaid Shaikh
article en

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly engaging in and taking a stance on public debates about controversial sociopolitical issues. This study explores how stakeholders’ political predispositions (i.e., political orientation and political trust) and contextual attitudes (i.e., societal issue salience and CSA skepticism) shape their attitudes toward CSA. The results of a preregistered representative survey in the Netherlands (<i>N</i> = 1,863) showed that stakeholder attitudes toward CSA are more positive when individuals identify less as conservative, trust political institutions more, and are more aware of major social (as opposed to economic or safety-related) issues. Moreover, we found an interaction effect between CSA skepticism and social issue salience on attitudes toward CSA: CSA attitudes become more positive with increasing social issue salience among highly skeptical individuals than among those with moderate or low CSA skepticism. These findings improve our understanding of the determinants of overall (favorable) evaluations of CSA across organizations and issue domains.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 206
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.