Evaluation of surgical competence outcomes of patients operated during the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

This study aimed to evaluate the oncological success and complication rates of laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases performed by a surgeon who was at the end of the learning curve and to reveal whether patients were cared by the surgeon during the learning curve by means of compromised patient safety. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery was performed on 78 patients by the same physician due to colorectal diseases between January 2018 and November 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups as the first 39 (Group 1) and the second 39 (Group 2) according to the date of surgery. The differences between the groups in age, abdominal surgery history, comorbidity, pathological stage and neoadjuvant area parameters were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Bleeding was only seen in one patient in Group 2. two patients in Group 1 had anastomotic leak, one patient had ileus, three patients were reoperated, two patients had urinal incontinence, one patient had anal incontinence, and two patients had erectile dysfunction. In Group 2, two patients had myocardial infarcts and two patients had ileus. Both surgical procedure differences and complication differences between patient groups were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Success rate in Group 1 was 82.0%, whereas it was 83.0% in Group 2 with statistically insignificant difference (p>0.05). Reoperation rate in Group 1 was 7.5% and 2.5% in Group 2, and differences were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Post operation complication rate was 12.5% in Group 1 and 22.5% in Group 2 with statistically insignificant difference (p>0.05). Similar oncological success rates were achieved in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal diseases by the same surgeon during the learning curve. There was no significant difference between the oncological success and complication rates of laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases performed by a surgeon at the end of the learning curve, and patients were not overlooked during the learning curve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Problems in Surgery
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2026.101982
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of surgical competence outcomes of patients operated during the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

S R Mizan, Ismail Mutlu, Vahit Mutlu, Kadir Yılmaz
Current Problems in Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Evaluation of surgical competence outcomes of patients operated during the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

S R Mizan, Ismail Mutlu, Vahit Mutlu, Kadir Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the oncological success and complication rates of laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases performed by a surgeon who was at the end of the learning curve and to reveal whether patients were cared by the surgeon during the learning curve by means of compromised patient safety. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery was performed on 78 patients by the same physician due to colorectal diseases between January 2018 and November 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups as the first 39 (Group 1) and the second 39 (Group 2) according to the date of surgery. The differences between the groups in age, abdominal surgery history, comorbidity, pathological stage and neoadjuvant area parameters were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Bleeding was only seen in one patient in Group 2. two patients in Group 1 had anastomotic leak, one patient had ileus, three patients were reoperated, two patients had urinal incontinence, one patient had anal incontinence, and two patients had erectile dysfunction. In Group 2, two patients had myocardial infarcts and two patients had ileus. Both surgical procedure differences and complication differences between patient groups were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Success rate in Group 1 was 82.0%, whereas it was 83.0% in Group 2 with statistically insignificant difference (p>0.05). Reoperation rate in Group 1 was 7.5% and 2.5% in Group 2, and differences were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Post operation complication rate was 12.5% in Group 1 and 22.5% in Group 2 with statistically insignificant difference (p>0.05). Similar oncological success rates were achieved in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal diseases by the same surgeon during the learning curve. There was no significant difference between the oncological success and complication rates of laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases performed by a surgeon at the end of the learning curve, and patients were not overlooked during the learning curve.

Current Problems in SurgeryVol. 76
Üsküdar University (TR), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Istanbul Commerce University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.