Examination of Replicate Syntheses of Metal Organic Frameworks as a Window into Reproducibility in Materials Chemistry

Replicate experiments are a useful tool in understanding the repeatability of scientific measurements. In 2019, a systematic search for replicate syntheses of a collection of 130 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) found that 89% of these materials had no reported replicate syntheses apart from the original publications identifying the material (AgrawalM., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.2020, 117, 877-88210.1073/pnas.1918484117). A potential weakness of that search was that only 5-11 years had elapsed since the original publication of each material. Here, this analysis is extended to all publications 11-17 years after the original publication. Although this extended time period identifies more repeat syntheses, 83% of the materials still have no reported replicate syntheses. We also consider how appropriately selected Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations can provide corroboration for the experimentally reported crystal structures. By using data from previous high-throughput DFT studies, corroborating evidence from DFT was available for 17% of the 130 structures for which no replicate syntheses are available. In total, approximately 1/3 of the 130 MOFs have data associated with replicate synthesis experiments and/or directly corroborating DFT calculations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c08003
Primary Topic
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of Replicate Syntheses of Metal Organic Frameworks as a Window into Reproducibility in Materials Chemistry

David S. Sholl
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
article

Examination of Replicate Syntheses of Metal Organic Frameworks as a Window into Reproducibility in Materials Chemistry

David S. Sholl
article en

Abstract

Replicate experiments are a useful tool in understanding the repeatability of scientific measurements. In 2019, a systematic search for replicate syntheses of a collection of 130 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) found that 89% of these materials had no reported replicate syntheses apart from the original publications identifying the material (AgrawalM., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.2020, 117, 877-88210.1073/pnas.1918484117). A potential weakness of that search was that only 5-11 years had elapsed since the original publication of each material. Here, this analysis is extended to all publications 11-17 years after the original publication. Although this extended time period identifies more repeat syntheses, 83% of the materials still have no reported replicate syntheses. We also consider how appropriately selected Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations can provide corroboration for the experimentally reported crystal structures. By using data from previous high-throughput DFT studies, corroborating evidence from DFT was available for 17% of the 130 structures for which no replicate syntheses are available. In total, approximately 1/3 of the 130 MOFs have data associated with replicate synthesis experiments and/or directly corroborating DFT calculations.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry CVol. 130(4)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.