The Role of Digit- and Pacifier-Sucking Habits on Malocclusion Development in Children: Anterior Open Bite and Posterior Crossbite—A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Malocclusion is one of the most prevalent oral health concerns in paediatric dentistry, with anterior open bite (AOB) and posterior crossbite (PCB) being among the most common forms. Non-nutritive sucking habits (NNSHs), including digit-sucking habits (DSHs) and pacifier-sucking habits (PSHs), have been linked to malocclusion development. While both habits are known to impact dental and skeletal development, their comparative effects remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the difference in the development and prevalence of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite between patients with digit-sucking and pacifier-sucking habits. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> An exhaustive review of the literature was conducted on the 25 November 2024 across three databases, namely EBSCOhost (including PubMed-Medline), Web of Science and Scopus. The following PICO question was constructed for the systematic review: "In children and teenagers, is there a difference in the development and prevalence of malocclusions (Anterior Open bite & Posterior Crossbite) between patients with a history of digit sucking habits and patients with a history of pacifier sucking habits?"A meta-analysis was also performed with the selected studies, and the software used to carry out the meta-analysis was R 4.3.1 (R Core Team (2023)). <b>Results:</b> From the initial search, 102 articles were found and a further 11 articles were obtained from manual findings. 12 articles were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that the risk of AOB and PCB was increased by both DSH and PSH. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both DSH and PSH significantly increased the risk of AOB and PCB. PSH posed a significantly higher risk than DSH for PCB development (OR = 2.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while no significant difference in AOB prevalence was observed between DSH and PSH (OR = 1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.150).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14010055
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Digit- and Pacifier-Sucking Habits on Malocclusion Development in Children: Anterior Open Bite and Posterior Crossbite—A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

S. RODRIGUEZ, Tawfiq Hijazi Alsadi, Arvin Faryad
Dentistry Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

The Role of Digit- and Pacifier-Sucking Habits on Malocclusion Development in Children: Anterior Open Bite and Posterior Crossbite—A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

S. RODRIGUEZ, Tawfiq Hijazi Alsadi, Arvin Faryad
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Malocclusion is one of the most prevalent oral health concerns in paediatric dentistry, with anterior open bite (AOB) and posterior crossbite (PCB) being among the most common forms. Non-nutritive sucking habits (NNSHs), including digit-sucking habits (DSHs) and pacifier-sucking habits (PSHs), have been linked to malocclusion development. While both habits are known to impact dental and skeletal development, their comparative effects remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the difference in the development and prevalence of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite between patients with digit-sucking and pacifier-sucking habits. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> An exhaustive review of the literature was conducted on the 25 November 2024 across three databases, namely EBSCOhost (including PubMed-Medline), Web of Science and Scopus. The following PICO question was constructed for the systematic review: "In children and teenagers, is there a difference in the development and prevalence of malocclusions (Anterior Open bite & Posterior Crossbite) between patients with a history of digit sucking habits and patients with a history of pacifier sucking habits?"A meta-analysis was also performed with the selected studies, and the software used to carry out the meta-analysis was R 4.3.1 (R Core Team (2023)). <b>Results:</b> From the initial search, 102 articles were found and a further 11 articles were obtained from manual findings. 12 articles were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that the risk of AOB and PCB was increased by both DSH and PSH. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both DSH and PSH significantly increased the risk of AOB and PCB. PSH posed a significantly higher risk than DSH for PCB development (OR = 2.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while no significant difference in AOB prevalence was observed between DSH and PSH (OR = 1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.150).

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(1)
Universitat de València (ES), Valencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr (ES)
Universitat de València
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.