Scientific integrity from a meta-ethical perspective: more contextualization and research ethics committees? A preliminary meta-ethics study

A thematic analysis of secondary information extracted from this sample enabled us to identify three principal themes in scientific integrity: its institutionalization, definition and applicability. And these themes, with their subthemes, highlighted two trends. On the one hand, scientific morality tends towards moral absolutism, whereas, on the other, it tends towards moral relativism. In other words, context does not, morally, justify anything in the first case, but can, ethically, justify certain things in the second. We think that it would be questionable to formalize scientific integrity as a moral absolutism, but this does not necessarily tip the balance in favor of radical moral relativism either. Scientific integrity should allow a contextualization of certain scientific practices within the framework of the activities of research ethics committees applying pragmatist ethical theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07639-3
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific integrity from a meta-ethical perspective: more contextualization and research ethics committees? A preliminary meta-ethics study

C. Hervé, Henri-Corto Stoeklé, Romane Lasterie
BMC Research Notes
Ethics in medical practice
article

Scientific integrity from a meta-ethical perspective: more contextualization and research ethics committees? A preliminary meta-ethics study

C. Hervé, Henri-Corto Stoeklé, Romane Lasterie
article en

Abstract

A thematic analysis of secondary information extracted from this sample enabled us to identify three principal themes in scientific integrity: its institutionalization, definition and applicability. And these themes, with their subthemes, highlighted two trends. On the one hand, scientific morality tends towards moral absolutism, whereas, on the other, it tends towards moral relativism. In other words, context does not, morally, justify anything in the first case, but can, ethically, justify certain things in the second. We think that it would be questionable to formalize scientific integrity as a moral absolutism, but this does not necessarily tip the balance in favor of radical moral relativism either. Scientific integrity should allow a contextualization of certain scientific practices within the framework of the activities of research ethics committees applying pragmatist ethical theories.

BMC Research NotesVol. 19(1)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Hôpital Foch (FR), Laboratoire de Droit des affaires et nouvelles technologies (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scientific integrity from a meta-ethical perspective: more contextualization and research ethics committees? A preliminary meta-ethics study — C. Hervé, Henri-Corto Stoeklé, et al. · BMC Research Notes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS