Use of CAD/CAM Workflow and Patient-Specific Implants for Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

<b>Background</b>: Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface remains one of the most demanding challenges in craniofacial surgery, requiring precise planning and a clear understanding of defect geometry to achieve functional and esthetic restoration. Advances in computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and virtual surgical planning (VSP), based on 3D segmentation of radiologic imaging, have significantly improved the management of maxillary deformities, allowing for further knowledge of patient-specific information, including anatomy, pathology, surgical planning, and reconstructive issues. The integration of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing has further transformed reconstruction through customized titanium meshes, implants, and surgical guides. <b>Methods</b>:This systematic review, conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes evidence from clinical studies on CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction of maxillary and midfacial defects of congenital, acquired, or post-resection origin. It highlights the advantages and drawbacks of maxillary reconstruction with patient-specific implants (PSISs). Primary outcomes are represented by accuracy in VSP reproduction, while secondary outcomes included esthetic results, functions, and assessment of complications. <b>Results</b>: Of the 44 identified articles, 10 met inclusion criteria with a time frame from April 2013 to July 2022. The outcomes of 24 treated patients are reported. CAD/CAM-guided techniques seemed to improve osteotomy accuracy, flap contouring, and implant adaptation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although current data support the efficacy and safety of CAD/CAM-based approaches, limitations persist, including high costs, technological dependency, and variable long-term outcome data. This article critically evaluates the role of PSISs in maxillofacial reconstruction and outlines future directions for its standardization and broader adoption in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020647
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of CAD/CAM Workflow and Patient-Specific Implants for Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

A. Tarsitano, Ali nosrati, Francesco Ceccariglia, Giovanni Badiali et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Use of CAD/CAM Workflow and Patient-Specific Implants for Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

A. Tarsitano, Ali nosrati, Francesco Ceccariglia, Giovanni Badiali, Diana D’Alpaos
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface remains one of the most demanding challenges in craniofacial surgery, requiring precise planning and a clear understanding of defect geometry to achieve functional and esthetic restoration. Advances in computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and virtual surgical planning (VSP), based on 3D segmentation of radiologic imaging, have significantly improved the management of maxillary deformities, allowing for further knowledge of patient-specific information, including anatomy, pathology, surgical planning, and reconstructive issues. The integration of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing has further transformed reconstruction through customized titanium meshes, implants, and surgical guides. <b>Methods</b>:This systematic review, conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes evidence from clinical studies on CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction of maxillary and midfacial defects of congenital, acquired, or post-resection origin. It highlights the advantages and drawbacks of maxillary reconstruction with patient-specific implants (PSISs). Primary outcomes are represented by accuracy in VSP reproduction, while secondary outcomes included esthetic results, functions, and assessment of complications. <b>Results</b>: Of the 44 identified articles, 10 met inclusion criteria with a time frame from April 2013 to July 2022. The outcomes of 24 treated patients are reported. CAD/CAM-guided techniques seemed to improve osteotomy accuracy, flap contouring, and implant adaptation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although current data support the efficacy and safety of CAD/CAM-based approaches, limitations persist, including high costs, technological dependency, and variable long-term outcome data. This article critically evaluates the role of PSISs in maxillofacial reconstruction and outlines future directions for its standardization and broader adoption in clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.