From Hyperpolite to Hyperefficient: A Continuum of User Politeness in Human–GenAI Interactions

This study explores user politeness in task-oriented information-seeking interactions with generative AI systems, focussing on how users deploy politeness strategies, how these interactional behaviours reflect their perceptions of AI and whether the politeness patterns they exhibit are influenced by the demographic factors age and gender. Using a subset of Frummet et al.’s (ACM Trans Inf Syst 42(5):1–29, 2024) Cooking with Conversation dataset, we annotated 30 user-agent conversations for politeness-relevant speech acts and conducted a cluster analysis. We derived four distinct politeness clusters: Hyperpolite, Polite and engaged, Engagement-seeking and Hyperefficient, reflecting a spectrum of interactional styles ranging from highly respectful, appreciative and engaged to task-oriented and efficient. The clusters suggest varying user perceptions of the agent, from human-like conversational partner to a more machine-like functional tool. However, no significant effects of age or gender on politeness patterns were found. This research establishes a basis for future interdisciplinary studies on how variation in user politeness—and the degree to which it is mirrored by the system—influence user satisfaction, inclusivity and information transfer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corpus Pragmatics
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-025-00225-1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Hyperpolite to Hyperefficient: A Continuum of User Politeness in Human–GenAI Interactions

Christine Elsweiler, David Elsweiler, Anna Ziegner
Corpus Pragmatics
AI in Service Interactions
article

From Hyperpolite to Hyperefficient: A Continuum of User Politeness in Human–GenAI Interactions

Christine Elsweiler, David Elsweiler, Anna Ziegner
article en

Abstract

This study explores user politeness in task-oriented information-seeking interactions with generative AI systems, focussing on how users deploy politeness strategies, how these interactional behaviours reflect their perceptions of AI and whether the politeness patterns they exhibit are influenced by the demographic factors age and gender. Using a subset of Frummet et al.’s (ACM Trans Inf Syst 42(5):1–29, 2024) Cooking with Conversation dataset, we annotated 30 user-agent conversations for politeness-relevant speech acts and conducted a cluster analysis. We derived four distinct politeness clusters: Hyperpolite, Polite and engaged, Engagement-seeking and Hyperefficient, reflecting a spectrum of interactional styles ranging from highly respectful, appreciative and engaged to task-oriented and efficient. The clusters suggest varying user perceptions of the agent, from human-like conversational partner to a more machine-like functional tool. However, no significant effects of age or gender on politeness patterns were found. This research establishes a basis for future interdisciplinary studies on how variation in user politeness—and the degree to which it is mirrored by the system—influence user satisfaction, inclusivity and information transfer.

Corpus PragmaticsVol. 10(1)
Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Regensburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Hyperpolite to Hyperefficient: A Continuum of User Politeness in Human–GenAI Interactions — Christine Elsweiler, David Elsweiler, et al. · Corpus Pragmatics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS