The influence of passenger rail interventions in London on relative deprivation in affected station catchment areas

This paper investigates the relationship between passenger rail interventions in Greater London and deprivation indices in affected station catchment areas. Interventions were selected for study only if they were associated with a significant change in jobs accessibility. It makes use of the difference-in-difference (DiD) research technique to test if these interventions have been associated with improvements in the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) ranking for the Lower-layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) within a 15-minute walking time of a station affected by the intervention. Though the study finds that a positive relationship is observed in all three case studies, in none is this relationship statistically significant. These findings illustrate the difficulties in demonstrating a relationship between passenger rail interventions and reductions in social and material deprivation, with consequences for future directions of policy and the practice of transport appraisal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Planning and Transport Research
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2026.2612861
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of passenger rail interventions in London on relative deprivation in affected station catchment areas

Joana Barros, Roberto Murcio, Matthew Whearty
Urban Planning and Transport Research
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

The influence of passenger rail interventions in London on relative deprivation in affected station catchment areas

Joana Barros, Roberto Murcio, Matthew Whearty
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between passenger rail interventions in Greater London and deprivation indices in affected station catchment areas. Interventions were selected for study only if they were associated with a significant change in jobs accessibility. It makes use of the difference-in-difference (DiD) research technique to test if these interventions have been associated with improvements in the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) ranking for the Lower-layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) within a 15-minute walking time of a station affected by the intervention. Though the study finds that a positive relationship is observed in all three case studies, in none is this relationship statistically significant. These findings illustrate the difficulties in demonstrating a relationship between passenger rail interventions and reductions in social and material deprivation, with consequences for future directions of policy and the practice of transport appraisal.

Urban Planning and Transport ResearchVol. 14(1)
CRC for Spatial information (AU), University College London (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The influence of passenger rail interventions in London on relative deprivation in affected station catchment areas — Joana Barros, Roberto Murcio, et al. · Urban Planning and Transport Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS