Developing sport officials: What can we learn from our knowledge on coach development?

Officials are a key stakeholder in the sporting ecosystem, similar to coaches and athletes. However, the development of officials has been significantly under-explored in the literature. The aim of this paper is to outline coach learning within development literature to identify concepts most relevant to officiating development, with a particular focus on formal, non-formal, and informal modes of learning. Drawing on the literature on coach development, we identify current knowledge on these developmental approaches in officiating, highlighting key gaps and future research directions in this area. In the context of coaching and officiating, formal approaches refer commonly to accreditation, whereas non-formal commonly refers to workshops/seminars, which are a broad term that can focus on specific topics of need. Informal learning represents a range of other learning approaches, where this paper focuses specifically on learning in context, observation, mentoring, and communities of practice. While this does not present an exhaustive list of informal approaches, these activities are relevant to the officiating role and have been explored in research. It is anticipated that this paper will facilitate a growth in research and evidence-informed practice in officiating, specifically on learning within development, which is an area that has often been under-resourced and under-developed. It is anticipated that this will provide a path forward for researchers and practitioners to understand the nuances of these approaches across different sports, countries and cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251408003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
57.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing sport officials: What can we learn from our knowledge on coach development?

Clare MacMahon, Paul Larkin, Aden Kittel, Alex Lascu et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
57.96
article

Developing sport officials: What can we learn from our knowledge on coach development?

Clare MacMahon, Paul Larkin, Aden Kittel, Alex Lascu, Will Vickery, Ian Cunningham
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Officials are a key stakeholder in the sporting ecosystem, similar to coaches and athletes. However, the development of officials has been significantly under-explored in the literature. The aim of this paper is to outline coach learning within development literature to identify concepts most relevant to officiating development, with a particular focus on formal, non-formal, and informal modes of learning. Drawing on the literature on coach development, we identify current knowledge on these developmental approaches in officiating, highlighting key gaps and future research directions in this area. In the context of coaching and officiating, formal approaches refer commonly to accreditation, whereas non-formal commonly refers to workshops/seminars, which are a broad term that can focus on specific topics of need. Informal learning represents a range of other learning approaches, where this paper focuses specifically on learning in context, observation, mentoring, and communities of practice. While this does not present an exhaustive list of informal approaches, these activities are relevant to the officiating role and have been explored in research. It is anticipated that this paper will facilitate a growth in research and evidence-informed practice in officiating, specifically on learning within development, which is an area that has often been under-resourced and under-developed. It is anticipated that this will provide a path forward for researchers and practitioners to understand the nuances of these approaches across different sports, countries and cultures.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Australian Sports Commission (AU), Deakin University (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Institute for Sports Medicine (DE), Victoria School of Management (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sport Psychology and Performance
57.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.