The onset of coastal foredune formation at variable levels of ecological complexity

Gaps in our understanding of the interplay between biotic and abiotic forces shaping coastal dunes inhibit our ability to fully understand their evolution and predict topographic changes. The theoretical evolution of a dune system begins with nebkha formation. This formation begins around individual dune-building plants, which grow over time around groups of plants. Individual nebkha mounds can meld into one another, growing in size and complexity based on the dune-building vegetation population. To better understand ecogeomorphological feedbacks driving these relationships, we tested how plant density impacts nebkha formation by Ammophila breviligulata in both a laboratory and a field setting. Laboratory tests consisted of using a wind tunnel to control abiotic forces, focusing on the effects of varying plant density in nebkha formation. We tested three low densities commonly supporting backshore nebkha: an individual (one plant) and small groups (five and nine plants). In the field, we used both remote sensing and field techniques to quantify the relationship between stem density and the nebkha shape and size of backshore A. breviligulata nebkha. In the wind tunnel, stem density was not as strong a predictor of nebkha size or shape as number of leaves and aboveground biomass, both of which increased with growing stem and plant densities. Stem density was a strong predictor of nebkha size and shape, with increasing variability at increasing densities in both the laboratory and field. In situ measurements of stem density are performed inconsistently among field experiments due to the effort required. Therefore, strong allometric scaling among A. breviligulata morphology metrics can help overcome limitations around what can be collected in the field or in a modeled environment containing limited plant metrics. In situ , vegetation stabilization frequently allowed the nebkha to grow steeper than would be expected based on grain size and the angle of repose. These differences in field and laboratory nebkha highlight the importance of grounding laboratory work in field collections for the interpretation of their results in nature. Understanding the underlying ecogeomorphic feedbacks involved in nebkha formation is critical to scaling up modeling efforts to forecast coastal foredune evolution, recovery, and storm response in the face of climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1691144
Primary Topic
Aeolian processes and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The onset of coastal foredune formation at variable levels of ecological complexity

Eric McGivney, Stephanie M. Dohner, Bianca R. Charbonneau, B. J. Franklin et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Aeolian processes and effects
article

The onset of coastal foredune formation at variable levels of ecological complexity

Eric McGivney, Stephanie M. Dohner, Bianca R. Charbonneau, B. J. Franklin, Alexander B. Sabo, Amy Williams, John Wnek, Kailey Matthews
article en

Abstract

Gaps in our understanding of the interplay between biotic and abiotic forces shaping coastal dunes inhibit our ability to fully understand their evolution and predict topographic changes. The theoretical evolution of a dune system begins with nebkha formation. This formation begins around individual dune-building plants, which grow over time around groups of plants. Individual nebkha mounds can meld into one another, growing in size and complexity based on the dune-building vegetation population. To better understand ecogeomorphological feedbacks driving these relationships, we tested how plant density impacts nebkha formation by Ammophila breviligulata in both a laboratory and a field setting. Laboratory tests consisted of using a wind tunnel to control abiotic forces, focusing on the effects of varying plant density in nebkha formation. We tested three low densities commonly supporting backshore nebkha: an individual (one plant) and small groups (five and nine plants). In the field, we used both remote sensing and field techniques to quantify the relationship between stem density and the nebkha shape and size of backshore A. breviligulata nebkha. In the wind tunnel, stem density was not as strong a predictor of nebkha size or shape as number of leaves and aboveground biomass, both of which increased with growing stem and plant densities. Stem density was a strong predictor of nebkha size and shape, with increasing variability at increasing densities in both the laboratory and field. In situ measurements of stem density are performed inconsistently among field experiments due to the effort required. Therefore, strong allometric scaling among A. breviligulata morphology metrics can help overcome limitations around what can be collected in the field or in a modeled environment containing limited plant metrics. In situ , vegetation stabilization frequently allowed the nebkha to grow steeper than would be expected based on grain size and the angle of repose. These differences in field and laboratory nebkha highlight the importance of grounding laboratory work in field collections for the interpretation of their results in nature. Understanding the underlying ecogeomorphic feedbacks involved in nebkha formation is critical to scaling up modeling efforts to forecast coastal foredune evolution, recovery, and storm response in the face of climate change.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 13
United States Naval Research Laboratory (US), Mahaveer Academy of Technology and Science University (IN), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Naval Physical & Oceanographic Laboratory (IN), University of Pennsylvania (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Aeolian processes and effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.