Femoral component sagittal alignment and its influence on short-term outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Variations in femoral component sagittal alignment may influence clinical outcomes and survival rates following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to systematically review the influence of femoral component sagittal alignment on short-term outcomes (≥ 6-month follow-up) and potentially characterize an optimal orientation. A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus with Full Text databases between January 2010 and April 2025. Eligible studies included adults undergoing primary TKA, quantified sagittal femoral component alignment, and reported at least one of the following outcomes with ≥ 6 months follow-up: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain, or revision/survivorship. Studies not stratifying outcomes by sagittal angle were excluded. After screening 2137 initial results, 10 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 9 being prospective/retrospective cohort studies and 1 Randomized Control Trial (RCT). Data extraction included study design, demographics, implant type, imaging/measurement method, sagittal alignment definitions, PROMs, ROM, and revision rates. Due to heterogeneity in alignment grouping and outcome reporting, a narrative synthesis was performed rather than a meta-analysis. Ten studies comprising 5,205 TKAs were included, with two robotic-assisted TKA cohorts and eight manual TKA cohorts. Mild flexion of the femoral component was frequently associated with improved short-term outcomes, but results differed by measurement method and outcome definition. Five of eight studies evaluating functional scores and five of six studies evaluating ROM reported improved outcomes with mild flexion compared with neutral or extended alignment. Only two studies explored failure rate, while anterior knee pain was only reported by one study. Across studies evaluating sagittal alignment in primary TKA, mild flexion of the femoral component was more commonly associated with improved functional outcomes, ROM, implant survival, and pain compared with neutral or extended alignment. However, these associations were inconsistent, and certainty of evidence was generally low or very low for most outcomes, indicating additional RCTs with standardized femoral flexion angle groupings and outcome measurements are needed to further investigate optimal sagittal component positioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09472-4
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Femoral component sagittal alignment and its influence on short-term outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Matthew Bullock, Caleb J. Pawl, William M. Stone, Aria Darbandi et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Femoral component sagittal alignment and its influence on short-term outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Matthew Bullock, Caleb J. Pawl, William M. Stone, Aria Darbandi, Caleb Morgan, Anna Hughes, Christopher E. Potts, Andrew B. Huffman, Alexander Burbelo
article en

Abstract

Variations in femoral component sagittal alignment may influence clinical outcomes and survival rates following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to systematically review the influence of femoral component sagittal alignment on short-term outcomes (≥ 6-month follow-up) and potentially characterize an optimal orientation. A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus with Full Text databases between January 2010 and April 2025. Eligible studies included adults undergoing primary TKA, quantified sagittal femoral component alignment, and reported at least one of the following outcomes with ≥ 6 months follow-up: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain, or revision/survivorship. Studies not stratifying outcomes by sagittal angle were excluded. After screening 2137 initial results, 10 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 9 being prospective/retrospective cohort studies and 1 Randomized Control Trial (RCT). Data extraction included study design, demographics, implant type, imaging/measurement method, sagittal alignment definitions, PROMs, ROM, and revision rates. Due to heterogeneity in alignment grouping and outcome reporting, a narrative synthesis was performed rather than a meta-analysis. Ten studies comprising 5,205 TKAs were included, with two robotic-assisted TKA cohorts and eight manual TKA cohorts. Mild flexion of the femoral component was frequently associated with improved short-term outcomes, but results differed by measurement method and outcome definition. Five of eight studies evaluating functional scores and five of six studies evaluating ROM reported improved outcomes with mild flexion compared with neutral or extended alignment. Only two studies explored failure rate, while anterior knee pain was only reported by one study. Across studies evaluating sagittal alignment in primary TKA, mild flexion of the femoral component was more commonly associated with improved functional outcomes, ROM, implant survival, and pain compared with neutral or extended alignment. However, these associations were inconsistent, and certainty of evidence was generally low or very low for most outcomes, indicating additional RCTs with standardized femoral flexion angle groupings and outcome measurements are needed to further investigate optimal sagittal component positioning.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 27(1)
Marshall University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.