Environmental journalism and the struggle against disinformation in Brazil: navigating digital hostility and climate crisis coverage

This study investigates how Brazilian journalists covering socio-environmental issues are affected by disinformation campaigns linked to far-right populism and lobbies opposing environmental protection. Based on in-depth interviews with 14 professionals specializing in environmental reporting, it analyzes how they perceive the digital hostility aimed at delegitimizing journalism and science. Although they do not feel silenced, participants report frustration and difficulties in responding to manipulative narratives. The accounts suggest that environmental coverage has become a field of symbolic dispute, particularly during the Bolsonaro administration, making disinformation a structural problem that affect daily journalistic routines. Strategies such as investigative reporting that expose economic interests, empathetic storytelling and the use of accessible language without falling into partisan disputes are seen as ways to confront this scenario of information disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1732001
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental journalism and the struggle against disinformation in Brazil: navigating digital hostility and climate crisis coverage

Claudia Sarmento
Frontiers in Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Environmental journalism and the struggle against disinformation in Brazil: navigating digital hostility and climate crisis coverage

Claudia Sarmento
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how Brazilian journalists covering socio-environmental issues are affected by disinformation campaigns linked to far-right populism and lobbies opposing environmental protection. Based on in-depth interviews with 14 professionals specializing in environmental reporting, it analyzes how they perceive the digital hostility aimed at delegitimizing journalism and science. Although they do not feel silenced, participants report frustration and difficulties in responding to manipulative narratives. The accounts suggest that environmental coverage has become a field of symbolic dispute, particularly during the Bolsonaro administration, making disinformation a structural problem that affect daily journalistic routines. Strategies such as investigative reporting that expose economic interests, empathetic storytelling and the use of accessible language without falling into partisan disputes are seen as ways to confront this scenario of information disorder.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
King's College - North Carolina (US)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.