UK Foundation doctors' perceptions of preference informed allocation: a national survey and thematic analysis

While PIA maintained high first-choice placements, concerns about fairness were prominent, particularly among UK graduates. Many respondents favoured reintroducing merit-based components. Continued evaluation is needed to ensure a fair, transparent, and acceptable allocation process for future graduates. Key messages What is already known on this topic: The UK Foundation Programme Office replaced performance-based allocation with preference informed allocation (PIA) in 2024, aiming to improve fairness, reduce stress, and align placements with applicant preferences. However, graduate perceptions of this change have not been fully explored. What this study adds: Most respondents disagreed that PIA was a fair allocation system and opposed its use for the specialized foundation programme, particularly younger, white, and UK graduates. Many expressed preferences for reintroducing merit-based elements, such as a standardized clinical examination. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: The findings highlight the need for ongoing evaluation of the PIA system to ensure fairness, transparency, and acceptability among medical graduates, and may help inform future postgraduate allocation reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf239
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UK Foundation doctors' perceptions of preference informed allocation: a national survey and thematic analysis

Faris Farooq Saeed Khan, Clare Van Hamel, Jessica Daniel
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Medical Education and Admissions
article

UK Foundation doctors' perceptions of preference informed allocation: a national survey and thematic analysis

Faris Farooq Saeed Khan, Clare Van Hamel, Jessica Daniel
article en

Abstract

While PIA maintained high first-choice placements, concerns about fairness were prominent, particularly among UK graduates. Many respondents favoured reintroducing merit-based components. Continued evaluation is needed to ensure a fair, transparent, and acceptable allocation process for future graduates. Key messages What is already known on this topic: The UK Foundation Programme Office replaced performance-based allocation with preference informed allocation (PIA) in 2024, aiming to improve fairness, reduce stress, and align placements with applicant preferences. However, graduate perceptions of this change have not been fully explored. What this study adds: Most respondents disagreed that PIA was a fair allocation system and opposed its use for the specialized foundation programme, particularly younger, white, and UK graduates. Many expressed preferences for reintroducing merit-based elements, such as a standardized clinical examination. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: The findings highlight the need for ongoing evaluation of the PIA system to ensure fairness, transparency, and acceptability among medical graduates, and may help inform future postgraduate allocation reforms.

Postgraduate Medical Journal
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.