UK Foundation doctors' perceptions of preference informed allocation: a national survey and thematic analysis
While PIA maintained high first-choice placements, concerns about fairness were prominent, particularly among UK graduates. Many respondents favoured reintroducing merit-based components. Continued evaluation is needed to ensure a fair, transparent, and acceptable allocation process for future graduates. Key messages What is already known on this topic: The UK Foundation Programme Office replaced performance-based allocation with preference informed allocation (PIA) in 2024, aiming to improve fairness, reduce stress, and align placements with applicant preferences. However, graduate perceptions of this change have not been fully explored. What this study adds: Most respondents disagreed that PIA was a fair allocation system and opposed its use for the specialized foundation programme, particularly younger, white, and UK graduates. Many expressed preferences for reintroducing merit-based elements, such as a standardized clinical examination. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: The findings highlight the need for ongoing evaluation of the PIA system to ensure fairness, transparency, and acceptability among medical graduates, and may help inform future postgraduate allocation reforms.
Authors
- Faris Farooq Saeed Khan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2360-1733)
- Clare Van Hamel
- Jessica Daniel
Institutions
- North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Published
- 2025-12-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf239
- Primary Topic
- Medical Education and Admissions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00