Social-ecological outcomes of agroecological transitions: A case study from natural farming systems in central India

In small-scale production systems, a transition to natural farming systems, characterized by minimal soil disturbance, reliance on bio-inputs, crop diversification, and elimination of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, may achieve higher social-ecological sustainability. While indicators of such positive outcomes have been shown when comparing conventional systems to agroecological systems, we know very little of the incremental changes in social-ecological sustainability during a transition. This study investigates a suite of indicators during such transitions among farms in central India. We operationalize a spectrum of farms –conventional farms (chemical input-dependent monocultures), transitional (bio-input adoption with partial synthetic fertilizer use), and agroecological (full bio-input usage, no synthetic inputs for at least two years, multiple agroecological practices). We collected qualitative data on social, economic, and ecological factors via farmer interviews [n = 60]. We analyzed our data using well-being indicators and the five capital assets framework. Our results showed that farms in-transition and established agroecological systems report positive social outcomes, including higher farmer well-being indicators related to community support. Importantly, even farmers in transition had stronger community networks than those using conventional practices. Dietary diversity improved as the transition progresses, with established agroecological farmers tending to have higher diversity of foods across all farmers compared to conventional farmers. Social, physical and natural capital assets were significantly higher for transitional and agroecological farmers, while financial capital assets were the same across all farmers. Our results indicate that farmers who transition from conventional practices to agroecological practices enhance many aspects of livelihood resiliency while maintaining financial assets. We contribute key dynamics in social-ecological outcomes during the process of refining conventional practices into agroecological practices, with implications for informing policy making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000212
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social-ecological outcomes of agroecological transitions: A case study from natural farming systems in central India

Om Damani, Adarshana Thapa, Marney E. Isaac, Siva Muthuprakash
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Social-ecological outcomes of agroecological transitions: A case study from natural farming systems in central India

Om Damani, Adarshana Thapa, Marney E. Isaac, Siva Muthuprakash
article en

Abstract

In small-scale production systems, a transition to natural farming systems, characterized by minimal soil disturbance, reliance on bio-inputs, crop diversification, and elimination of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, may achieve higher social-ecological sustainability. While indicators of such positive outcomes have been shown when comparing conventional systems to agroecological systems, we know very little of the incremental changes in social-ecological sustainability during a transition. This study investigates a suite of indicators during such transitions among farms in central India. We operationalize a spectrum of farms –conventional farms (chemical input-dependent monocultures), transitional (bio-input adoption with partial synthetic fertilizer use), and agroecological (full bio-input usage, no synthetic inputs for at least two years, multiple agroecological practices). We collected qualitative data on social, economic, and ecological factors via farmer interviews [n = 60]. We analyzed our data using well-being indicators and the five capital assets framework. Our results showed that farms in-transition and established agroecological systems report positive social outcomes, including higher farmer well-being indicators related to community support. Importantly, even farmers in transition had stronger community networks than those using conventional practices. Dietary diversity improved as the transition progresses, with established agroecological farmers tending to have higher diversity of foods across all farmers compared to conventional farmers. Social, physical and natural capital assets were significantly higher for transitional and agroecological farmers, while financial capital assets were the same across all farmers. Our results indicate that farmers who transition from conventional practices to agroecological practices enhance many aspects of livelihood resiliency while maintaining financial assets. We contribute key dynamics in social-ecological outcomes during the process of refining conventional practices into agroecological practices, with implications for informing policy making.

PLOS Sustainability and TransformationVol. 5(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social-ecological outcomes of agroecological transitions: A case study from natural farming systems in central India — Om Damani, Adarshana Thapa, et al. · PLOS Sustainability and Transformation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS