Steroid-Sparing Effects of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) presents significant management challenges, largely due to reliance on systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for symptom control. Advances in biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation have shown promise in reducing polyp burden, improving symptoms, and decreasing the need for SCSs and surgery.ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis compare the steroid-sparing efficacy of biologics and safety with other biologics or standard care in CRSwNP. Key outcomes include reducing SCS Use and drug safety.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biologics versus placebo/standard care in adults with CRSwNP. The primary outcomes were SCS reduction and safety. Meta-analyses, which use a statistical method called random effects models, were employed.ResultsThis meta-analysis of seven RCTs (n = 3097) revealed that biologic therapies significantly reduce SCS use in CRSwNP patients (pooled proportion: 20.9%, 95% CI: 8.4%-37.0%), though with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 98.3%). Trial-level predictors included control-arm safety profiles (higher serious adverse events (SAEs) reduced treatment effects) [odds ratio (OR) 0.70]. In contrast, placebo-arm SAEs enhanced them [OR 1.81]) and sample size (larger trials showed diluted responses [OR 0.993 per patient]). These results highlight the role of trial design and baseline patient risk in determining the interest of the results. They further highlight the possibility for individualized strategies in terms of treatment and call for more in-depth studies with patient-level data to refine the steroid-sparing therapeutic strategy, providing an impetus for future work in this area.ConclusionsThe biologics, specifically dupilumab, represent a paradigm shift in treating CRSwNP, significantly decreasing the burden of SCS-their consistent safety and efficacy support integration into treatment algorithms for severe cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251414922
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steroid-Sparing Effects of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ahmad Salman Alroqi, Yasser Alarimah, Khaled A. Almanea, Ali M. Alsudays
American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Steroid-Sparing Effects of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ahmad Salman Alroqi, Yasser Alarimah, Khaled A. Almanea, Ali M. Alsudays
article en

Abstract

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) presents significant management challenges, largely due to reliance on systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for symptom control. Advances in biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation have shown promise in reducing polyp burden, improving symptoms, and decreasing the need for SCSs and surgery.ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis compare the steroid-sparing efficacy of biologics and safety with other biologics or standard care in CRSwNP. Key outcomes include reducing SCS Use and drug safety.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biologics versus placebo/standard care in adults with CRSwNP. The primary outcomes were SCS reduction and safety. Meta-analyses, which use a statistical method called random effects models, were employed.ResultsThis meta-analysis of seven RCTs (n = 3097) revealed that biologic therapies significantly reduce SCS use in CRSwNP patients (pooled proportion: 20.9%, 95% CI: 8.4%-37.0%), though with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 98.3%). Trial-level predictors included control-arm safety profiles (higher serious adverse events (SAEs) reduced treatment effects) [odds ratio (OR) 0.70]. In contrast, placebo-arm SAEs enhanced them [OR 1.81]) and sample size (larger trials showed diluted responses [OR 0.993 per patient]). These results highlight the role of trial design and baseline patient risk in determining the interest of the results. They further highlight the possibility for individualized strategies in terms of treatment and call for more in-depth studies with patient-level data to refine the steroid-sparing therapeutic strategy, providing an impetus for future work in this area.ConclusionsThe biologics, specifically dupilumab, represent a paradigm shift in treating CRSwNP, significantly decreasing the burden of SCS-their consistent safety and efficacy support integration into treatment algorithms for severe cases.

American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), King Saud Medical City (SA), King Saud University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.