Effect of Elastomeric Bearing Anchorage on the Seismic Performance of Highway Bridges

ABSTRACT Elastomeric bearings are critical structural bridge components that transfer loads between the bridge superstructure and substructure. Their influence on the bridge's seismic behavior depends on their anchorage method, which can alter how forces are distributed throughout the structure. This study examines the seismic performance of simply supported highway bridges with prestressed concrete girders, focusing on the influence of different elastomeric bearing anchorage methods. A benchmark bridge designed under the current Chilean bridge code is analyzed. For this bridge, the following three elastomeric bearing configurations are evaluated: unbonded bearings at piers and abutments, bonded bearings at both locations, and a proposed hybrid configuration employing bonded bearings at abutments and unbonded bearings at piers. In addition, the effect of bridge column flexibility is also analyzed, considering three column heights for each bearing configuration. Detailed three‐dimensional nonlinear numerical models were developed in OpenSees. The seismic performance assessment of the case studies included nonlinear static analyses, nonlinear response history analyses, and fragility assessments. Results show that unbonded bearings limit substructure demands but lead to excessive superstructure displacements and high unseating probabilities. Bonded bearings effectively control displacements but amplify substructure demands. The proposed hybrid configuration balances these trade‐offs, reducing substructure damage while maintaining effective superstructure control. The fragility analysis highlights the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid configuration in achieving a balanced seismic response, especially for bridges with more flexible columns, where it outperforms other configurations in reducing bridge system fragility. These findings underscore the potential of hybrid bearing configurations to optimize overall bridge seismic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70120
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Elastomeric Bearing Anchorage on the Seismic Performance of Highway Bridges

José A. Gallardo, Esteban Amaya, Hernán Santa María, Henrry Rojas‐Asuero
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Effect of Elastomeric Bearing Anchorage on the Seismic Performance of Highway Bridges

José A. Gallardo, Esteban Amaya, Hernán Santa María, Henrry Rojas‐Asuero
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Elastomeric bearings are critical structural bridge components that transfer loads between the bridge superstructure and substructure. Their influence on the bridge's seismic behavior depends on their anchorage method, which can alter how forces are distributed throughout the structure. This study examines the seismic performance of simply supported highway bridges with prestressed concrete girders, focusing on the influence of different elastomeric bearing anchorage methods. A benchmark bridge designed under the current Chilean bridge code is analyzed. For this bridge, the following three elastomeric bearing configurations are evaluated: unbonded bearings at piers and abutments, bonded bearings at both locations, and a proposed hybrid configuration employing bonded bearings at abutments and unbonded bearings at piers. In addition, the effect of bridge column flexibility is also analyzed, considering three column heights for each bearing configuration. Detailed three‐dimensional nonlinear numerical models were developed in OpenSees. The seismic performance assessment of the case studies included nonlinear static analyses, nonlinear response history analyses, and fragility assessments. Results show that unbonded bearings limit substructure demands but lead to excessive superstructure displacements and high unseating probabilities. Bonded bearings effectively control displacements but amplify substructure demands. The proposed hybrid configuration balances these trade‐offs, reducing substructure damage while maintaining effective superstructure control. The fragility analysis highlights the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid configuration in achieving a balanced seismic response, especially for bridges with more flexible columns, where it outperforms other configurations in reducing bridge system fragility. These findings underscore the potential of hybrid bearing configurations to optimize overall bridge seismic performance.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 55(5)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.