“So, How Does It Look?” The Role of Cardiac Sonographers in Communicating Preliminary Results to Patients Within New South Wales: A Legislative and Ethical Review

ABSTRACT Cardiac sonographers play a critical role in image acquisition and preliminary interpretation of echocardiography examinations. In New South Wales (NSW), cardiac sonographers frequently encounter the ethically complex and professionally challenging question from patients: “so, how does it look?” Despite their capacity to recognize significant pathology, legal and regulatory frameworks in NSW provide limited guidance on whether they may disclose preliminary findings directly to the patient at the time of the examination. This paper provides an initial exploration into the legal and ethical permissibility of such communication, drawing upon professional standards, state legislation, and core ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non‐maleficence, and justice. While the Australasian Sonographers Association (ASA) offers guidance on communication and scope of practice, the absence of statutory regulation under the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) leaves many cardiac sonographers in legally ambiguous positions in relation to this topic. A case study highlights the emotional toll of non‐disclosure on patients, and comparisons with obstetric sonography illustrate similar challenges, while demonstrating the benefits of clearer communication training pathways. The analysis suggests cardiac sonographers may currently be underutilized in mitigating patient anxiety and facilitating informed care, however, without legislative reform and standardized policy, the disclosure of preliminary findings remains inconsistent and legally precarious for cardiac sonographers practicing within NSW. The paper calls for further research into the topic, an introduction of formal regulation of the echocardiography profession, and the development of communication training and professional support frameworks to better align practice with ethical obligations and patient expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sonography
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sono.70037
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“So, How Does It Look?” The Role of Cardiac Sonographers in Communicating Preliminary Results to Patients Within New South Wales: A Legislative and Ethical Review

James Gregory Rendina Silcock
Sonography
Radiology practices and education
article

“So, How Does It Look?” The Role of Cardiac Sonographers in Communicating Preliminary Results to Patients Within New South Wales: A Legislative and Ethical Review

James Gregory Rendina Silcock
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cardiac sonographers play a critical role in image acquisition and preliminary interpretation of echocardiography examinations. In New South Wales (NSW), cardiac sonographers frequently encounter the ethically complex and professionally challenging question from patients: “so, how does it look?” Despite their capacity to recognize significant pathology, legal and regulatory frameworks in NSW provide limited guidance on whether they may disclose preliminary findings directly to the patient at the time of the examination. This paper provides an initial exploration into the legal and ethical permissibility of such communication, drawing upon professional standards, state legislation, and core ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non‐maleficence, and justice. While the Australasian Sonographers Association (ASA) offers guidance on communication and scope of practice, the absence of statutory regulation under the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) leaves many cardiac sonographers in legally ambiguous positions in relation to this topic. A case study highlights the emotional toll of non‐disclosure on patients, and comparisons with obstetric sonography illustrate similar challenges, while demonstrating the benefits of clearer communication training pathways. The analysis suggests cardiac sonographers may currently be underutilized in mitigating patient anxiety and facilitating informed care, however, without legislative reform and standardized policy, the disclosure of preliminary findings remains inconsistent and legally precarious for cardiac sonographers practicing within NSW. The paper calls for further research into the topic, an introduction of formal regulation of the echocardiography profession, and the development of communication training and professional support frameworks to better align practice with ethical obligations and patient expectations.

SonographyVol. 13(1)
John Hunter Hospital (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
Queensland University of Technology
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.