Summary of the Development of a Joint Position Statement on Low and No‐Calorie Sweeteners ( <scp>LNCS</scp> ) From the British Dietetic Association ( <scp>BDA</scp> ), British Nutrition Foundation ( <scp>BNF</scp> ) and Diabetes <scp>UK</scp>

Low and no-sugar sweeteners (LCNS) are used in the food supply, notably within the beverage industry in many countries, where sugar reduction is a key public health concern. In the UK, following the announcement and implementation of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), nearly 9 out of 10 soft drinks contain < 5 g sugar per 100 mL, most of which now contain LNCS. In 2023, the World Health Organisation (WHO) issued a guideline with a conditional recommendation advising that LNCS should not be used as 'a means of achieving weight control or reducing the risk of non-communicable disease' (NCDs). This recommendation potentially conflicted with existing recommendations from several authoritative sources at the time, including the Diabetes UK position statement published in 2018 (developed in collaboration with the British Dietetic Association, BDA and the British Nutrition Foundation, BNF), as well as information on the NHS website, which suggests that LCNS can be helpful in reducing sugar intake. More recently, a working group comprising the BDA, BNF and Diabetes UK produced an updated insight document. This review included a re-evaluation of the WHO's systematic review and meta-analysis, alongside the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) statement on the guideline. The narrative review outlines the relationship between LNCS and a range of public health outcomes, including weight management, dental health, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes (T2D), cancer and related risk markers such as appetite and gut microbiome composition. The insights document also considered the safety of LNCS and their impact on overall dietary quality. The insight document informed a subsequent joint position statement from the three organisations, highlighting research gaps and providing practical guidance for healthcare professionals to support individuals living with obesity and diabetes in reducing sugar intake. It also includes recommendations for policymakers and identifies actions for the food industry. The Position Statement emphasises that, while LNCS may not directly promote weight loss or reduce disease risk, they can serve as a useful tool for reducing sugar intake at both individual and population levels, at least acting as a 'stepping stone' from sugar-sweetened foods and unsweetened food and beverages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Bulletin
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70044
Primary Topic
Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Summary of the Development of a Joint Position Statement on Low and No‐Calorie Sweeteners ( LNCS ) From the British Dietetic Association ( BDA ), British Nutrition Foundation ( BNF ) and Diabetes UK

Duane Mellor, Douglas Twenefour, Natasha Marsland, A. Spiro et al.
Nutrition Bulletin
Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
article

Summary of the Development of a Joint Position Statement on Low and No‐Calorie Sweeteners ( LNCS ) From the British Dietetic Association ( BDA ), British Nutrition Foundation ( BNF ) and Diabetes UK

Duane Mellor, Douglas Twenefour, Natasha Marsland, A. Spiro, Sara Stanner, Stephanie Kudzin, Paul McArdle
article en

Abstract

Low and no-sugar sweeteners (LCNS) are used in the food supply, notably within the beverage industry in many countries, where sugar reduction is a key public health concern. In the UK, following the announcement and implementation of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), nearly 9 out of 10 soft drinks contain < 5 g sugar per 100 mL, most of which now contain LNCS. In 2023, the World Health Organisation (WHO) issued a guideline with a conditional recommendation advising that LNCS should not be used as 'a means of achieving weight control or reducing the risk of non-communicable disease' (NCDs). This recommendation potentially conflicted with existing recommendations from several authoritative sources at the time, including the Diabetes UK position statement published in 2018 (developed in collaboration with the British Dietetic Association, BDA and the British Nutrition Foundation, BNF), as well as information on the NHS website, which suggests that LCNS can be helpful in reducing sugar intake. More recently, a working group comprising the BDA, BNF and Diabetes UK produced an updated insight document. This review included a re-evaluation of the WHO's systematic review and meta-analysis, alongside the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) statement on the guideline. The narrative review outlines the relationship between LNCS and a range of public health outcomes, including weight management, dental health, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes (T2D), cancer and related risk markers such as appetite and gut microbiome composition. The insights document also considered the safety of LNCS and their impact on overall dietary quality. The insight document informed a subsequent joint position statement from the three organisations, highlighting research gaps and providing practical guidance for healthcare professionals to support individuals living with obesity and diabetes in reducing sugar intake. It also includes recommendations for policymakers and identifies actions for the food industry. The Position Statement emphasises that, while LNCS may not directly promote weight loss or reduce disease risk, they can serve as a useful tool for reducing sugar intake at both individual and population levels, at least acting as a 'stepping stone' from sugar-sweetened foods and unsweetened food and beverages.

Nutrition BulletinVol. 51(1)
British Dietetic Association (GB), University of Canberra (AU), British Nutrition Foundation (GB), Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), Diabetes UK (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.