Automated Mapping of Legal Criteria to the Texts of Adjudicatory Decisions Using LLMs

Legal reasoning, argumentation and decision making employ various structures, containing logically connected criteria when determining specific outcomes. Here, we examine whether large language models (LLMs) can automatically map decision texts to such criteria, by determining whether the decision maker found the criteria to be satisfied or not, and by providing explanations as to why the decision maker arrived at a particular decision. We introduce a Web-browser interface (CATLEX) to present the user with the LLM-generated determinations and explanations. We evaluate the ability of LLMs to generate such determinations and explanations, based on an experiment on 50 cases in the domain of military veterans’ disability appeals in the United States. A quantitative and qualitative analysis shows promising results, with the best model achieving an F1-score of 0.97 and explanations being generally accurate and useful. The results suggest new ways of reading decisions and developing legal arguments, with significant potential in, e.g., access to justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3769126.3769236
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Mapping of Legal Criteria to the Texts of Adjudicatory Decisions Using LLMs

Hannes Westermann, Vern R. Walker, Jaromir Savelka
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Automated Mapping of Legal Criteria to the Texts of Adjudicatory Decisions Using LLMs

Hannes Westermann, Vern R. Walker, Jaromir Savelka
article en

Abstract

Legal reasoning, argumentation and decision making employ various structures, containing logically connected criteria when determining specific outcomes. Here, we examine whether large language models (LLMs) can automatically map decision texts to such criteria, by determining whether the decision maker found the criteria to be satisfied or not, and by providing explanations as to why the decision maker arrived at a particular decision. We introduce a Web-browser interface (CATLEX) to present the user with the LLM-generated determinations and explanations. We evaluate the ability of LLMs to generate such determinations and explanations, based on an experiment on 50 cases in the domain of military veterans’ disability appeals in the United States. A quantitative and qualitative analysis shows promising results, with the best model achieving an F1-score of 0.97 and explanations being generally accurate and useful. The results suggest new ways of reading decisions and developing legal arguments, with significant potential in, e.g., access to justice.

Hofstra University (US), Maastricht University (NL), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Mapping of Legal Criteria to the Texts of Adjudicatory Decisions Using LLMs — Hannes Westermann, Vern R. Walker, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS