Predicting the critical temperature of superconductors and materials classification with a balanced dataset without prior knowledge

The discovery of new superconductors through traditional trial-and-error experimental methods is both challenging and costly. A data-driven strategy can speed up the time-consuming exploration processes and also potentially reveal new insights into the complex correlations at play. Several material databases have been created for predicting the superconducting critical temperature (Tc), but they are confined solely to superconducting materials, limiting their prediction capabilities. In addressing this, we compiled a comprehensive open-source dataset encompassing both superconductors and non-superconductors. Our dataset contains 13 415 superconductors and 13 425 non-superconductors, each characterized by 212 features. Novel features, namely, CuO layers, ionic radius, heat of vaporization, cohesive energy, and thermal conductivity with respect to every element in the material were included. Another feature named “material type” was introduced to classify materials as low-temperature superconductors, high-temperature superconductors, and non-superconductors. Various machine learning techniques, including boosting and bagging methods, were employed to predict Tc. The light gradient boosting model emerged as the most effective, achieving a coefficient of determination of 93% and a mean absolute error of 2.93 K. While this novel, comprehensive material dataset is made available to enrich future research, a web application is also developed for predicting Tc of any material in relation to the material type based on the best of trained models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0290299
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting the critical temperature of superconductors and materials classification with a balanced dataset without prior knowledge

P. A. H. Nawoda, M. D. T. Attygalle, Gayan P. Hettiarachchi
Journal of Applied Physics
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Predicting the critical temperature of superconductors and materials classification with a balanced dataset without prior knowledge

P. A. H. Nawoda, M. D. T. Attygalle, Gayan P. Hettiarachchi
article en

Abstract

The discovery of new superconductors through traditional trial-and-error experimental methods is both challenging and costly. A data-driven strategy can speed up the time-consuming exploration processes and also potentially reveal new insights into the complex correlations at play. Several material databases have been created for predicting the superconducting critical temperature (Tc), but they are confined solely to superconducting materials, limiting their prediction capabilities. In addressing this, we compiled a comprehensive open-source dataset encompassing both superconductors and non-superconductors. Our dataset contains 13 415 superconductors and 13 425 non-superconductors, each characterized by 212 features. Novel features, namely, CuO layers, ionic radius, heat of vaporization, cohesive energy, and thermal conductivity with respect to every element in the material were included. Another feature named “material type” was introduced to classify materials as low-temperature superconductors, high-temperature superconductors, and non-superconductors. Various machine learning techniques, including boosting and bagging methods, were employed to predict Tc. The light gradient boosting model emerged as the most effective, achieving a coefficient of determination of 93% and a mean absolute error of 2.93 K. While this novel, comprehensive material dataset is made available to enrich future research, a web application is also developed for predicting Tc of any material in relation to the material type based on the best of trained models.

Journal of Applied PhysicsVol. 139(2)
Rikkyo University (JP), University of Colombo (LK), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.